IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v23y2016i2p138-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical analysis of the 2014 Major League Baseball season

Author

Listed:
  • James T. Peach
  • Steven L. Fullerton
  • Thomas M. Fullerton

Abstract

An econometric analysis of the 2014 Major League Baseball season is conducted with respect to regular season victories. Results obtained confirm many, but not all, results reported in prior research. The importance of solid team pitching and offence is underscored. Team defence did not vary sufficiently to play a statistically significant role in team victory differences. Outcomes for total payrolls and salary disparities differ substantially from prior seasons. History may serve as a guide to what occurs on the field, but it does not always replicate the patterns of bygone years. Ultimately, 2014 represents another departure from the standard baseball norm.

Suggested Citation

  • James T. Peach & Steven L. Fullerton & Thomas M. Fullerton, 2016. "An empirical analysis of the 2014 Major League Baseball season," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 138-141, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:138-141
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1058898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2015.1058898
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2015.1058898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas M. Fullerton & James T. Peach, 2016. "Major League Baseball 2015, What a Difference a Year Makes," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(18), pages 1289-1293, December.
    2. Steven L. FULLERTON & James H. HOLCOMB & Thomas M. FULLERTON, 2017. "Any given season?," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 238-246, September.
    3. Christophe Ley & Yves Dominicy, 2017. "Mutual Point-winning Probabilities (MPW): a New Performance Measure for Table Tennis," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2017-23, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:138-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.