IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apbizr/v29y2023i4p1059-1078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are government subsidies or preferential listing policies better for the market performance of tech firms? Evidence from Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Soon Suk Yoon
  • Hyo Jin Kim

Abstract

Tech firms are growth engines in modern economies. We examine which policies, government subsidies or preferential listing, work better for tech firms’ performance. We test whether Korean tech firms outperform control firms using key market-based performance metrics. Tech firms benefiting from Korea’s preferential listing system outperform control firms in funding, patent creation, and market capitalization but underperform in IPO-day returns. In contrast, government subsidies do not affect market performance other than six-month returns from the IPO date. These findings indicate that preferential listing policies are better than government subsidies for the market performance of tech firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Soon Suk Yoon & Hyo Jin Kim, 2023. "Are government subsidies or preferential listing policies better for the market performance of tech firms? Evidence from Korea," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 1059-1078, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:29:y:2023:i:4:p:1059-1078
    DOI: 10.1080/13602381.2023.2222001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13602381.2023.2222001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13602381.2023.2222001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:29:y:2023:i:4:p:1059-1078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FAPB20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.