IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apbizr/v26y2020i2p149-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elective affinity between guanxi favouritism and market rationality: guanxi circles as governance structure in China’s private firms

Author

Listed:
  • Yanjie Bian
  • Man Shuai

Abstract

This study presents three case studies intended to examine Chinese private firms’ reliance on guanxi-oriented governance structure under different degrees of market rationality. Our findings show that regardless of their profitability goal, employment size, and organizational complexity, the three companies under study rely rather equally on their central players’ guanxi circle as the governance structure. Furthermore, when someone is permitted to enter this guanxi circle and exercise a certain degree of managerial authority, both job competence and personal trust of this person are simultaneously evaluated. We interpret these findings not as evidence of conflict between market rationality and guanxi favouritism, but as evidence for Weberian elective affinity between the two seemingly conflicting principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanjie Bian & Man Shuai, 2020. "Elective affinity between guanxi favouritism and market rationality: guanxi circles as governance structure in China’s private firms," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 149-168, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:26:y:2020:i:2:p:149-168
    DOI: 10.1080/13602381.2019.1654214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13602381.2019.1654214
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13602381.2019.1654214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:26:y:2020:i:2:p:149-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FAPB20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.