IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v80y2026i2p277-285.html

A Design for Observational Studies in Which Some People Avoid Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Paul R. Rosenbaum

Abstract

A simple but better design is proposed for observational studies in which receipt of treatment is rare in a large subpopulation defined by measured covariates. In such a subpopulation, few responses to treatment are observed, but there are abundant untreated controls. The design is matched in two ratios, a low ratio—perhaps matched pairs—for the subpopulation where treatment is common, and a high ratio—perhaps 1-to-4—for the subpopulation where treatment is uncommon, retaining this distinction throughout the study, rather than presuming that avoidance of treatment is inconsequential. Theoretical considerations that favor this design are discussed informally with reference to the existing literature on observational studies. These include: increased design sensitivity, possible effect modification and its possible consequences for design sensitivity, counterfactual low risk in relation to design sensitivity, and the degree to which conclusions may be generalized. The design is exemplified by a study with 1212 treatment-control matched pairs and 213 sets matched 1-to-4, so that more than 30% of the 3489=2×1212+213+4×213 study subjects come from the subpopulation that rarely receives treatment. The R package aamatch contains the unmatched data, reconstructs the matched data, and replicates the analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2026. "A Design for Observational Studies in Which Some People Avoid Treatment," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(2), pages 277-285, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:2:p:277-285
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2026.2623909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2026.2623909
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2026.2623909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:2:p:277-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.