IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v80y2026i2p217-231.html

Flexible Bayesian Multiple Comparison Adjustment Using Dirichlet Process and Beta-Binomial Model Priors

Author

Listed:
  • Don van den Bergh
  • Fabian Dablander

Abstract

Researchers frequently wish to assess the equality or inequality of groups, but this poses the challenge of adequately adjusting for multiple comparisons. Statistically, all possible configurations of equality and inequality constraints can be uniquely represented as partitions of groups, where any number of groups are equal if they are in the same element of the partition. In a Bayesian framework, one can adjust for multiple comparisons by constructing a suitable prior distribution over all possible partitions. Inspired by work on variable selection in regression, we propose a class of flexible beta-binomial priors for multiple comparison adjustment. We compare this prior setup to the Dirichlet process prior suggested by Gopalan and Berry and multiple comparison adjustment methods that do not specify a prior over partitions directly. Our approach not only allows researchers to assess pairwise equality constraints but simultaneously all possible equalities among all groups. Since the space of possible partitions grows rapidly—for 10 groups, there are already 115,975 possible partitions—we use a stochastic search algorithm to efficiently explore the space. Our method is implemented in the Julia package EqualitySampler, and we illustrate it on examples related to the comparison of means, standard deviations, and proportions.

Suggested Citation

  • Don van den Bergh & Fabian Dablander, 2026. "Flexible Bayesian Multiple Comparison Adjustment Using Dirichlet Process and Beta-Binomial Model Priors," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(2), pages 217-231, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:2:p:217-231
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2025.2561146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2025.2561146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2025.2561146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:2:p:217-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.