IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v80y2026i1p61-76.html

American Football Scores: Using Partially Regularized Ordinal Regression to Adjust for Strength of Opponents, Within-Team Complementary Unit Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Skripnikov
  • Sujit Sivadanam

Abstract

American football is unique in that offensive and defensive units typically consist of separate players who don’t share the field simultaneously, which tempts one to evaluate them independently. However, a team’s offensive and defensive performances often complement each other. For instance, turnovers forced by the defense can create easier scoring opportunities for the offense. Using drive-by-drive data from 2014 to 2020 Division-I college football (Football Bowl Subdivision, FBS) and 2009–2017 National Football League (NFL) seasons, we identify complementary football features that impact scoring the most. We employ regularized ordinal regression with an elastic penalty, enabling variable selection and partially relaxing the proportional odds assumption. Moreover, given the importance of accounting for strength of the opposition, we incorporate unpenalized components to ensure full adjustment for strength of schedule. For residual diagnostics of our ordinal regression models we apply the surrogate approach, creatively extending its use to nonproportional odds models. We then adjust each team’s offensive (defensive) performance to project it onto a league-average complementary unit, showcasing the effects of these adjustments on team scoring. Lastly, we evaluate the out-of-sample prediction performance of our selected model, highlighting improvements gained from incorporating complementary football features alongside strength-of-schedule adjustments.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Skripnikov & Sujit Sivadanam, 2026. "American Football Scores: Using Partially Regularized Ordinal Regression to Adjust for Strength of Opponents, Within-Team Complementary Unit Performance," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(1), pages 61-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:1:p:61-76
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2025.2539998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2025.2539998
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2025.2539998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:1:p:61-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.