Author
Listed:
- Toby Hackmann
- Doranne Thomassen
- Anne M. Stiggelbout
- Saskia le Cessie
- Hein Putter
- Liesbeth C. de Wreede
- Ewout W. Steyerberg
Abstract
Sample size is an essential indicator of the uncertainty in clinical research results. When studies present time-to-event outcomes with Kaplan-Meier curves, these are often accompanied by the remaining number of patients at risk in a table below the curve. The number at risk at time t informs about uncertainty of the hazard at t, rather than the uncertainty of the estimated survival probability until t,Ŝ(t). We aim to review the role of the effective sample size of Ŝ(t) to reflect the uncertainty in survival probability estimation. Effective sample size is defined as the size of a hypothetical sample with complete follow-up until time t, that would give the same variance as the variance of the Kaplan-Meier estimate Ŝ(t). We consider hypothetical scenarios and a publicly available dataset with patients treated for colon cancer. These illustrations support that effective sample size provides a readily interpretable measure of uncertainty for survival curves in the presence of censoring. We show that effective sample size can also quantify the loss of information when the reporting for an ongoing study is moved to an earlier time point. In conclusion, effective sample size is a valuable measure of uncertainty in survival analysis.
Suggested Citation
Toby Hackmann & Doranne Thomassen & Anne M. Stiggelbout & Saskia le Cessie & Hein Putter & Liesbeth C. de Wreede & Ewout W. Steyerberg, 2026.
"Effective Sample Size for the Kaplan-Meier Estimator: A Valuable Measure of Uncertainty?,"
The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(1), pages 100-108, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:1:p:100-108
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2025.2542390
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:80:y:2026:i:1:p:100-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.