IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v79y2025i2p236-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Effective and Small Sample-Size Valid Confidence Interval for Isotonic Dose–Response Curves by Inverting a Partial Likelihood Ratio Test

Author

Listed:
  • J. G. Liao

Abstract

A dose–response curve is essential for determining the safe dosage of a drug and is widely used in bioassay and in phase 1 clinical trials. It is generally accepted that the probability of death or the probability of dose-limiting toxicity is a nondecreasing function of the dose. This article proposes and develops an effective point-wise confidence interval for an isotonic dose–response curve, a problem without a satisfactory solution so far. We show that one subset of the observations informs the lower limit while the other subset informs the upper limit. A partial likelihood ratio test using these subsets of observations is fully investigated. The resulting confidence interval is compared to three existing methods (Morris, Meyer, and Oron) in an extensive simulation study. The new method produces tight intervals while maintaining coverage. It is therefore preferred when maintaining an actual coverage probability is crucial as often in a regulatory environment. The new method extends to one-way ANOVA of a continuous response variable in a straightforward way. An R function is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • J. G. Liao, 2025. "An Effective and Small Sample-Size Valid Confidence Interval for Isotonic Dose–Response Curves by Inverting a Partial Likelihood Ratio Test," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(2), pages 236-246, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:79:y:2025:i:2:p:236-246
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2407478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2024.2407478
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2024.2407478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:79:y:2025:i:2:p:236-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.