IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v77y2023i2p160-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forbidden Knowledge and Specialized Training: A Versatile Solution for the Two Main Sources of Overfitting in Linear Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Rohlfs

Abstract

Overfitting in linear regression is broken down into two main causes. First, the formula for the estimator includes “forbidden knowledge” about training observations’ residuals, and it loses this advantage when deployed out-of-sample. Second, the estimator has “specialized training” that makes it particularly capable of explaining movements in the predictors that are idiosyncratic to the training sample. An out-of-sample counterpart is introduced to the popular “leverage” measure of training observations’ importance. A new method is proposed to forecast out-of-sample fit at the time of deployment, when the values for the predictors are known but the true outcome variable is not. In Monte Carlo simulations and in an empirical application using MRI brain scans, the proposed estimator performs comparably to Predicted Residual Error Sum of Squares (PRESS) for the average out-of-sample case and unlike PRESS, also performs consistently across different test samples, even those that differ substantially from the training set.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Rohlfs, 2023. "Forbidden Knowledge and Specialized Training: A Versatile Solution for the Two Main Sources of Overfitting in Linear Regression," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(2), pages 160-168, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:2:p:160-168
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2128874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2128874
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2128874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:2:p:160-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.