IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v75y2021i1p66-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Sample Size Allocation and Power in a Bayesian Two-Stage Drop-the-Losers Design

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Karanevich
  • Richard Meier
  • Stefan Graw
  • Anna McGlothlin
  • Byron Gajewski

Abstract

When a researcher desires to test several treatment arms against a control arm, a two-stage adaptive design can be more efficient than a single-stage design where patients are equally allocated to all treatment arms and the control. We see this type of approach in clinical trials as a seamless Phase II–Phase III design. These designs require more statistical support and are less straightforward to plan and analyze than a standard single-stage design. To diminish the barriers associated with a Bayesian two-stage drop-the-losers design, we built a user-friendly point-and-click graphical user interface with R Shiny to aid researchers in planning such designs by allowing them to easily obtain trial operating characteristics, estimate statistical power and sample size, and optimize patient allocation in each stage to maximize power. We assume that endpoints are distributed normally with unknown but common variance between treatments. We recommend this software as an easy way to engage statisticians and researchers in two-stage designs as well as to actively investigate the power of two-stage designs relative to more traditional approaches. The software is freely available at https://github.com/stefangraw/Allocation-Power-Optimizer.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Karanevich & Richard Meier & Stefan Graw & Anna McGlothlin & Byron Gajewski, 2021. "Optimizing Sample Size Allocation and Power in a Bayesian Two-Stage Drop-the-Losers Design," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(1), pages 66-75, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:66-75
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1610065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2019.1610065
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2019.1610065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:66-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.