IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v75y2020i1p104-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum

Author

Listed:
  • David R. Bickel

Abstract

Hypothesis tests are conducted not only to determine whether a null hypothesis (H0) is true but also to determine the direction or sign of an effect. A simple estimate of the posterior probability of a sign error is PSE = (1 – PH0)p/2 + PH0, depending only on a two-sided p-value and PH0, an estimate of the posterior probability of H0. A convenient option for PH0 is the posterior probability derived from estimating the Bayes factor to be its e p ln (1/p) lower bound. In that case, PSE depends only on p and an estimate of the prior probability of H0. PSE provides a continuum between significance testing and traditional Bayesian testing. The former effectively assumes the prior probability of H0 is 0, as some statisticians argue. In that case, PSE is equal to a one-sided p-value. (In that sense, PSE is a calibrated p-value.) In traditional Bayesian testing, on the other hand, the prior probability of H0 is at least 50%, which usually brings PSE close to PH0.

Suggested Citation

  • David R. Bickel, 2020. "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(1), pages 104-112, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2020:i:1:p:104-112
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2020.1816214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2020.1816214
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2020.1816214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:75:y:2020:i:1:p:104-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.