IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v74y2020i2p156-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plotting Likelihood-Ratio-Based Confidence Regions for Two-Parameter Univariate Probability Models

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Weld
  • Andrew Loh
  • Lawrence Leemis

Abstract

Plotting two-parameter confidence regions is nontrivial. Numerical methods often rely on a computationally expensive grid-like exploration of the parameter space. A recent advance reduces the two-dimensional problem to many one-dimensional problems employing a trigonometric transformation that assigns an angle ϕ from the maximum likelihood estimator, and an unknown radial distance to its confidence region boundary. This paradigm shift can improve computational runtime by orders of magnitude, but it is not robust. Specifically, parameters differing greatly in magnitude and/or challenging nonconvex confidence region shapes make the plot susceptible to inefficiencies and/or inaccuracies. This article improves the technique by (i) keeping confidence region boundary searches in the parameter space, (ii) selectively targeting confidence region boundary points in lieu of uniformly spaced ϕ angles from the maximum likelihood estimator and (iii) enabling access to regions otherwise unreachable due to multiple roots for select ϕ angles. Two heuristics are given for ϕ selection: an elliptic-inspired angle selection heuristic and an intelligent smoothing search heuristic. Finally, a jump-center heuristic permits plotting otherwise inaccessible multiroot regions. This article develops these heuristics for two-parameter likelihood-ratio-based confidence regions associated with univariate probability distributions, and introduces the R conf package, which automates the process and is publicly available via CRAN.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Weld & Andrew Loh & Lawrence Leemis, 2020. "Plotting Likelihood-Ratio-Based Confidence Regions for Two-Parameter Univariate Probability Models," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(2), pages 156-168, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:74:y:2020:i:2:p:156-168
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1564696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2018.1564696
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2018.1564696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:74:y:2020:i:2:p:156-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.