IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v73y2019i3p288-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Equivalence of Two Common Mixture Models for Duration Data

Author

Listed:
  • Peter S. Fader
  • Bruce G. S. Hardie
  • Daniel McCarthy
  • Ramnath Vaidyanathan

Abstract

The beta-geometric (BG) distribution and the Pareto distribution of the second kind (P(II)) are two basic models for duration-time data that share some underlying characteristics (i.e., continuous mixtures of memoryless distributions), but differ in two important respects: first, the BG is the natural model to use when the event of interest occurs in discrete time, while the P(II) is the right choice for a continuous-time setting. Second, the underlying mixing distributions (the beta and gamma for the BG and P(II), respectively), are very different—and often believed to be noncomparable with each other. Despite these and other key differences, the two models are strikingly similar in terms of their fit and predictive performance as well as their parameter estimates. We explore this equivalence, both empirically and analytically, and discuss the implications from both a substantive and methodological standpoint.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter S. Fader & Bruce G. S. Hardie & Daniel McCarthy & Ramnath Vaidyanathan, 2019. "Exploring the Equivalence of Two Common Mixture Models for Duration Data," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(3), pages 288-295, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:73:y:2019:i:3:p:288-295
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1543134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:73:y:2019:i:3:p:288-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.