IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v73y2019i1p70-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simple Measures of Individual Cluster-Membership Certainty for Hard Partitional Clustering

Author

Listed:
  • Dongmeng Liu
  • Jinko Graham

Abstract

We propose two probability-like measures of individual cluster-membership certainty that can be applied to a hard partition of the sample such as that obtained from the partitioning around medoids (PAM) algorithm, hierarchical clustering or k-means clustering. One measure extends the individual silhouette widths and the other is obtained directly from the pairwise dissimilarities in the sample. Unlike the classic silhouette, however, the measures behave like probabilities and can be used to investigate an individual’s tendency to belong to a cluster. We also suggest two possible ways to evaluate the hard partition using these measures. We evaluate the performance of both measures in individuals with ambiguous cluster membership, using simulated binary datasets that have been partitioned by the PAM algorithm or continuous datasets that have been partitioned by hierarchical clustering and k-means clustering. For comparison, we also present results from soft-clustering algorithms such as soft analysis clustering (FANNY) and two model-based clustering methods. Our proposed measures perform comparably to the posterior probability estimators from either FANNY or the model-based clustering methods. We also illustrate the proposed measures by applying them to Fisher’s classic dataset on irises.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongmeng Liu & Jinko Graham, 2019. "Simple Measures of Individual Cluster-Membership Certainty for Hard Partitional Clustering," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 70-79, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:73:y:2019:i:1:p:70-79
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1459315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2018.1459315
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2018.1459315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:73:y:2019:i:1:p:70-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.