IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v72y2018i4p321-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Survey of Reporting Practices of Computer Simulation Studies in Statistical Research

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Harwell
  • Nidhi Kohli
  • Yadira Peralta-Torres

Abstract

Computer simulation studies represent an important tool for investigating processes difficult or impossible to study using mathematical theory or real data. Hoaglin and Andrews recommended these studies be treated as statistical sampling experiments subject to established principles of design and data analysis, but the survey of Hauck and Anderson suggested these recommendations had, at that point in time, generally been ignored. We update the survey results of Hauck and Anderson using a sample of studies applying simulation methods in statistical research to assess the extent to which the recommendations of Hoaglin and Andrews and others for conducting simulation studies have been adopted. The important role of statistical applications of computer simulation studies in enhancing the reproducibility of scientific findings is also discussed. The results speak to the state of the art and the extent to which these studies are realizing their potential to inform statistical practice and a program of statistical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Harwell & Nidhi Kohli & Yadira Peralta-Torres, 2018. "A Survey of Reporting Practices of Computer Simulation Studies in Statistical Research," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(4), pages 321-327, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:72:y:2018:i:4:p:321-327
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1342692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2017.1342692
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2017.1342692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:72:y:2018:i:4:p:321-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.