IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v70y2016i2p215-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confidence Intervals and the Within-the-Bar Bias

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher S. Pentoney
  • Dale E. Berger

Abstract

Bar graphs displaying means have been shown to bias interpretations of the underlying distributions: viewers typically report higher likelihoods for values within a bar than outside of a bar. One explanation is that viewer attention is driven by the whole bar, rather than only the edge that provides information about an average. This study explored several approaches to correcting this bias. Bar graphs with 95% confidence intervals were used with different levels of contrast to manipulate attention directed to the bar. Viewers showed less bias when the salience of the bar itself was reduced. Response latencies were lowest and bias was eliminated when participants were presented with only a confidence interval and no bar.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher S. Pentoney & Dale E. Berger, 2016. "Confidence Intervals and the Within-the-Bar Bias," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 215-220, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:70:y:2016:i:2:p:215-220
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1141706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2016.1141706
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2016.1141706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:70:y:2016:i:2:p:215-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.