IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v69y2015i4p409-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Curriculum Guidelines to Learning Outcomes: Assessment at the Program Level

Author

Listed:
  • Beth Chance
  • Roxy Peck

Abstract

The 2000 ASA Guidelines for Undergraduate Statistics majors aimed to provide guidance to programs with undergraduate degrees in statistics as to the content and skills that statistics majors should be learning. The 2014 Guidelines revise the earlier guidelines to reflect changes in the discipline. As programs strive to adjust their curricula to align with the 2014 Guidelines, it is appropriate to also think about developing an assessment cycle of evaluation. This will enable programs to determine whether students are learning what we want them to learn and to work on continuously improving the program over time. The first step is to translate the broader Guidelines into institution-specific measurable learning outcomes. This article focuses on providing examples of learning outcomes developed by different institutions based on the 2000 Guidelines. The companion article by Moore and Kaplan (this issue) focuses on choosing appropriate assessment methods and rubrics and creating an assessment plan. We hope the examples provided are illustrative and that they will assist programs as they implement the 2014 Guidelines.[Received November 2014. Revised July 2015.]

Suggested Citation

  • Beth Chance & Roxy Peck, 2015. "From Curriculum Guidelines to Learning Outcomes: Assessment at the Program Level," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 409-416, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:69:y:2015:i:4:p:409-416
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2015.1077730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2015.1077730
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2015.1077730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:69:y:2015:i:4:p:409-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.