IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v7y2010i2p229-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practising virtual action learning at university

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Hauser

Abstract

The University for Applied Management is a semi-virtual institution widely using blended learning as an integrated approach of face-to-face instruction and e-learning. Virtual action learning is offered in all bachelor and master programmes. The module is transfer orientated and aims at encouraging reflection and supporting students to develop a holistic view of their tasks. In doing so it differs from ordinary university instruction. Implementing action learning in university programmes was and is a learning process in itself. This article will present the chosen approach, review a case and discuss the learnings

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Hauser, 2010. "Practising virtual action learning at university," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 229-235, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:2:p:229-235
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2010.488346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2010.488346
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2010.488346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brendon Harvey, 2009. "Action learning: developing innovative networks of practice … for ideas worth sharing," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 97-100, March.
    2. Michael Marquardt & Deborah Waddill, 2004. "The power of learning in action learning: a conceptual analysis of how the five schools of adult learning theories are incorporated within the practice of action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 185-202, September.
    3. Jean-Anne Stewart & Gillian Alexander, 2006. "Virtual action learning: experiences from a study of an SME e-learning programme," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 141-159, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronald J. Degen, 2012. "Effective Student Assessment in Virtual Learning Courses Based on the Guided-Experience Approach," Working Papers 93, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Johson & Akil Amiraly, 2017. "Bringing entrepreneurial methods into the scientific classroom [L'introduction d'une approche entrepreneuriale dans un cours de sciences fondamentales]," Post-Print hal-01574725, HAL.
    2. Andrew D. Eaton & Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco & Shelley L. Craig & Soo Chan Carusone & Michael Montess & Gordon A. Wells & Galo F. Ginocchio, 2018. "A blended learning curriculum for training peer researchers to conduct community-based participatory research," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 139-150, May.
    3. Cheri Speier-Pero, 2018. "Leveraging Experiential Field Projects—Discovery Learning in a Masters in Analytics Program," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 162-173, May.
    4. Alan Mumford, 2006. "Action learning: nothing so practical as a good theory," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(01), pages 69-76.
    5. Carmen Bălan & Daniela Ioniţă, 2011. "Exploratory Research on the Organizational Learning in Small Enterprises and Implications for the Economic Higher Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 464-481, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:2:p:229-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.