IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v7y2010i2p121-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evidence for the effectiveness of action learning

Author

Listed:
  • H. Skipton Leonard
  • Michael J. Marquardt

Abstract

For the past 50 years, organizations and individuals around the world have reported success in their use of action learning programs to solve problems, develop leaders, build teams and transform their corporate cultures. However, very little rigorous research has been conducted to determine the effectiveness of action learning. The authors reviewed 21 refereed articles, theses and dissertations that quantitatively and/or qualitatively measured the impact of action learning and to determine the success factors in action learning programs. The evidence elicited from these studies support the following: (1) action learning develops broad executive and managerial leadership skills, particularly collaborative leadership and coaching skills; (2) action learning improves the ability of managers to develop integrative, win/win solutions to conflict situations; (3) governing variables that were consistently identified as critical to the success of action learning include questioning, taking action, learning from group members, listening, group diversity, feelings of confidence and well-being, safe environment, and the presence of a coach; and (4) significant factors for conducting successful action learning programs involved: (1) team-level processes of skilled coaching, diversity, self-directed team processes, effective team presentations and review of team processes; as well as (2) organization-level processes of ensuring implementation of solutions, alignment and importance of the problem, support of top decision makers and the leveraging of organizational resources.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Skipton Leonard & Michael J. Marquardt, 2010. "The evidence for the effectiveness of action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 121-136, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:2:p:121-136
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2010.488323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2010.488323
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2010.488323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janice Byrne & Frédéric Delmar & Alain Fayolle & Wadid Lamine, 2016. "Training corporate entrepreneurs: an action learning approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 479-506, August.
    2. Martha Mumbi Simwanza & Olawumi Dele Awolusi, 2020. "Customer Experience Monitoring: A Study of Zambian Banks," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17.
    3. Cheri Speier-Pero, 2018. "Leveraging Experiential Field Projects—Discovery Learning in a Masters in Analytics Program," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 162-173, May.
    4. Hinrichsen, Carsten & Nelausen, Malene Kubstrup & Nielsen, Line & Santini, Ziggi Ivan & Meilstrup, Charlotte & Rod, Morten Hulvej & Koushede, Vibeke & Lauridsen, Sigurd, 2022. "The workings of an action learning program for building mental health promotion capacity – A realist evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Andrew D. Eaton & Francisco Ibáñez-Carrasco & Shelley L. Craig & Soo Chan Carusone & Michael Montess & Gordon A. Wells & Galo F. Ginocchio, 2018. "A blended learning curriculum for training peer researchers to conduct community-based participatory research," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 139-150, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:2:p:121-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.