IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acceur/v17y2020i3p334-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of Public Interest Arguments in the European Accounting Field

Author

Listed:
  • Costanza Di Fabio

Abstract

This paper explores how the global standard setter and the European Union (EU) use public interest arguments; the study discusses these in relation to the perceptions of the actors included in the ‘public sphere’. The study examines texts expressing actors’ positions, revealing that the standard setter and the EU employ these arguments rhetorically to safeguard their political position. The findings show that respondents supporting the EU’s arguments are mostly continental, in line with a Europe-centric notion of ‘public’. Additionally, these arguments are often interpreted as a political tool to favour banks’ private interests rather than to safeguard a common interest in the health of the European economy. Further, the EU’s arguments show a potential threat to the IFRS’s status of globally accepted standards. The findings underscore the importance of considering the link between the global level at which standards are developed and their impact on jurisdictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Costanza Di Fabio, 2020. "The use of Public Interest Arguments in the European Accounting Field," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 334-366, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:334-366
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2020.1841904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2020.1841904
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17449480.2020.1841904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acceur:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:334-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.