IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v6y2018i2p820-829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptance criterion of state coercion in contemporary society

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Finogentova

    (Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russian Federation)

  • Vasiliy Tokarev

    (Samara State Regional Academy, Russian Federation)

  • Mikhail Petrenko

    (International Market Institute, Russian Federation)

  • Tatyana Primak

    (Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russian Federation)

Abstract

The article presents acceptance criterion of the state coercion as a form of power realization. According to authors, essential signs of the state coercion, firstly, are functionaries and state authorities representing the society that in turn, legitimizing this state, secondly, the state coercion mediacy by the right. Its social nature causes understanding the state coercion as a legal relation that coercive and coerced subjects, authorized with certain rights and duties, enter. The authorization of subjects, in relation to which enforcement actions are applied, with legal rights and duties testifies to the legal conditionality of state coercion. As a result, it must satisfy the requirements of legality, legitimacy and justice at both levels of the legal system – sectoral and intersectoral – and at all stages of the process of its implementation. The general acceptance criterion of the state coercion is provided to recognize the conformity of its application to the requirements of justice as a moral category. Structural elements of this criterion are validity and proportionality. Their differentiation in content makes it possible to assert that the state coercion should be based on the law (validity) and correlated with individualizing circumstances, which allowing to correct the influence of the coercive on the coerced taking into account the specifics of the concrete case (proportionality).

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Finogentova & Vasiliy Tokarev & Mikhail Petrenko & Tatyana Primak, 2018. "Acceptance criterion of state coercion in contemporary society," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 820-829, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:820-829
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(23)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/22/Finogentova_Acceptance_criterion_of_state_coercion_in_contemporary_society.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/254
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(23)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jozef Kuril, 2018. "Public administration for safe and secure environment: case of Slovak Republic," Post-Print hal-01773586, HAL.
    2. Jozef Kuril, 2018. "Public administration for safe and secure environment: case of Slovak Republic," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 493-501, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vaidas Jurkevičius & Vaidas Jurkevičius & Yuliia Pokhodun, 2018. "The doctrine of apparent authority as a precondition for sustainable business," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 649-661, December.
    2. Igor Leonidovich Vorotnikov & Irina Fedorovna Sukhanova & Mariya Yuryevna Lyavina & Marina Ivanovna Glukhova & Konstantin Aleksandrovich Petrov, 2019. "Economic sanctions and import substitution," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 1872-1883, June.
    3. Peter Holcsik & Judith Pálfi & Miklos Tompa & Janusz Grabara & Zsolt Čonka & Michal Kolcun & Mihai Avornicului & Karol Jędrasiak, 2020. "Management of Smart Switchboard Placement to Enhance Distribution System Reliability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel FAGGIANELLI & Sorin BURLACU & Cécile CARRA, 2018. "Victimization Of Health Professionals In Bucharest Service Relations And Social Work Relationships," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(30), pages 109-126, June.
    2. Ladislav MURA & Dominika VLACSEKOVÁ, 2018. "Motivation Of Public Employees: Case Study Of Slovak Teaching And Professional Staf," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(31), pages 67-80, December.
    3. Marina Gennadievna Nikitina & Viktoriya Viktorovna Pobirchenko & Elena Alekseevna Shutaieva & Anna Ivanovna Karlova, 2018. "The investment component in a nation’s economic security: the case of the Russian Federation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 958-967, December.
    4. Rasa Smaliukiene & Gintaras Labutis & Ausrius Juozapavicius, 2020. "Pro-Environmental Energy Behavior in the Military: Assessing Behavior Change Factors at a Selected Military Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    coercion; justice; validity; proportionality; legal right; legitimacy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:820-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.