IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v99y2019i6d10.1007_s10273-019-2470-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vorschlag zur Grundrente: ungerecht, ineffizient und teuer — Replik und Erwiderung
[Proposal on Basic Pension: Unfair, Inefficient and Expensive — Reply and Response]

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Köhler-Rama

    (Hochschule des Bundes in Berlin)

  • Franz Ruland

Abstract

Zusammenfassung In der Märzausgabe 2019 veröffentlichte der Wirtschaftsdienst einen Aufsatz mit dem Titel „Vorschlag zur Grundrente: ungerecht, ineffizient und teuer“ von Franz Ruland. Tim Köhler-Rama vertritt hier eine andere Auffassung, er plädiert für die Grundrente als Element des sozialen Ausgleichs im Rentenrecht. Im Anschluss erläutert Ruland seinen Standpunkt in einer Erwiderung.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Köhler-Rama & Franz Ruland, 2019. "Vorschlag zur Grundrente: ungerecht, ineffizient und teuer — Replik und Erwiderung [Proposal on Basic Pension: Unfair, Inefficient and Expensive — Reply and Response]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(6), pages 432-439, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:99:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10273-019-2470-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-019-2470-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-019-2470-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-019-2470-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "Federal Government Basic Pension Plans: There Are Better Solutions," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 27(02), pages 18-20, April.
    2. Joachim Ragnitz, 2020. "The Coalition Compromise on the Basic Pension: Well Meant, Badly Done," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(03), pages 48-52, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:99:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10273-019-2470-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.