IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v38y2024i4d10.1007_s11269-024-03741-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Morphometric Analysis and Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds for Soil Erosion Susceptibility: A Comparison between Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Compound Parameter Analysis Method

Author

Listed:
  • Shantha Kumar Dhanush

    (University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK)

  • M. Mahadeva Murthy

    (University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK)

  • A. Sathish

    (University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK)

Abstract

The identification of critical sub-watersheds susceptible to soil erosion risk is the preliminary step in any watershed management plan. To achieve this goal, it is crucial to prioritize sub-watersheds based on morphometric characteristics. This study was performed on the Upper Shimsha-1 watershed using a digital elevation model to quantify the morphometric parameters. The stream network was extracted using ArcGIS software, and the watershed was delineated into 16 sub-watersheds (denoted as SW1–SW16). Two approaches, namely, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and compound parameter analysis, were employed to prioritize sub-watersheds using 18 parameters highly related to soil erodibility. The FAHP score ranged from 0.145 (lowest priority) to 0.795 (highest priority), classifying sub-watersheds into ‘high’, ‘medium’ and ‘low’ classes occupying 10.76%, 27.23% and 62.01% of the total area, respectively. The compound parameter values ranged from 6.05 (highest priority) to 10.77 (lowest priority), and the ‘high’, ‘medium’ and ‘low’ classes occupied 31.84%, 16.49% and 51.67% of the total area, respectively. Common sub-watersheds identified as ‘high’ priority by both methods were SW14 and SW15, accounting for 10.76%, whereas under the ‘low’ priority class, SW1, SW8, SW9, SW11, SW12 and SW16 accounted for 42.66% of the total area. Consequently, eight sub-watersheds were found to be common in both prioritization methods corresponding to their respective priority classes. Through this investigation, the integration of GIS technology, morphometry and prioritization methods has proven to be indispensable in watershed management and soil conservation efforts. The findings further emphasize the urgent need for attention from decision-makers toward critical sub-watersheds.

Suggested Citation

  • Shantha Kumar Dhanush & M. Mahadeva Murthy & A. Sathish, 2024. "Quantitative Morphometric Analysis and Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds for Soil Erosion Susceptibility: A Comparison between Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Compound Parameter Analysis Method," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(4), pages 1587-1606, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03741-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03741-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03741-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-03741-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Jaiswal & Narayan Ghosh & A. Lohani & T. Thomas, 2015. "Fuzzy AHP Based Multi Crteria Decision Support for Watershed Prioritization," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4205-4227, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noori, Amir & Bonakdari, Hossein & Salimi, Amir Hossein & Gharabaghi, Bahram, 2021. "A group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method for water supply choice optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Giorgos Mallinis & Ioannis Z. Gitas & Georgios Tasionas & Fotis Maris, 2016. "Multitemporal Monitoring of Land Degradation Risk Due to Soil Loss in a Fire-Prone Mediterranean Landscape Using Multi-decadal Landsat Imagery," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(3), pages 1255-1269, February.
    3. S. L. Razavi Toosi & J. M. V. Samani, 2017. "Prioritizing Watersheds Using a Novel Hybrid Decision Model Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy VIKOR," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2853-2867, July.
    4. Yiqing Sun & Zhenzhong Shen & Weihua Fang & Jiaao Yu & Lei Gan & Liqun Xu & Runying Wang & Hongwei Zhang & Ruiwen Liu & Congcong Zhou & Zhangxin Huang, 2024. "Evaluation of ecologically clean small watersheds in the Yangtze river estuary area of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26147-26170, October.
    5. Ali Azarnivand & Arash Malekian, 2016. "Analysis of Flood Risk Management Strategies Based on a Group Decision Making Process via Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(6), pages 1903-1921, April.
    6. Shaher H. Zyoud & Daniela Fuchs-Hanusch, 2019. "Comparison of Several Decision-Making Techniques: A Case of Water Losses Management in Developing Countries," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1551-1578, September.
    7. Deepak Agnihotri & Tarun Kumar & Dalchand Jhariya, 2021. "Intelligent vulnerability prediction of soil erosion hazard in semi-arid and humid region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2524-2551, February.
    8. José Matheus Bezerra Santos Amorim & Saulo de Tarso Marques Bezerra & Maísa Mendonça Silva & Lyanne Cibely Oliveira Sousa, 2020. "Multicriteria Decision Support for Selection of Alternatives Directed to Integrated Urban Water Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(13), pages 4253-4269, October.
    9. Seyed Farhan Moosavian & Daryoosh Borzuei & Abolfazl Ahmadi, 2022. "Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4843-4862, September.
    10. Seyedeh Leila RazaviToosi & J. M. V. Samani, 2019. "A Fuzzy Group Decision Making Framework Based on ISM-FANP-FTOPSIS for Evaluating Watershed Management Strategies," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(15), pages 5169-5190, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03741-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.