IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/topjnl/v24y2016i3d10.1007_s11750-016-0414-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Steady-state analysis of M/M/c/c-type retrial queueing systems with constant retrial rate

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Lebedev

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)

  • Vadym Ponomarov

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)

Abstract

The paper deals with a research of bivariate Markov process $$\{X(t), t\ge 0\}$$ { X ( t ) , t ≥ 0 } whose state space is a lattice semistrip $$S(X)=\{0,1,{\ldots },c\} \times Z_{+}$$ S ( X ) = { 0 , 1 , … , c } × Z + . The process $$\{X(t), t\ge 0\}$$ { X ( t ) , t ≥ 0 } describes the service policy of a multi-server retrial queue in which the rate of repeated flow does not depend on the number of sources of retrial calls. In this class of queues, a vector–matrix representation of steady-state distribution was obtained. This representation allows to write down the stationary probabilities through the model parameters in closed form and to propose the closed formulas of its main performance measures. The investigative techniques use an approximation of the initial model by means of the truncated one and the direct passage to the limit.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Lebedev & Vadym Ponomarov, 2016. "Steady-state analysis of M/M/c/c-type retrial queueing systems with constant retrial rate," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(3), pages 693-704, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:24:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11750-016-0414-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11750-016-0414-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11750-016-0414-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11750-016-0414-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Artalejo, J. R. & Gomez-Corral, A. & Neuts, M. F., 2001. "Analysis of multiserver queues with constant retrial rate," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 569-581, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yacov Satin & Evsey Morozov & Ruslana Nekrasova & Alexander Zeifman & Ksenia Kiseleva & Anna Sinitcina & Alexander Sipin & Galina Shilova & Irina Gudkova, 2018. "Upper bounds on the rate of convergence for constant retrial rate queueing model with two servers," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1271-1282, December.
    2. Tuan Phung-Duc & Wouter Rogiest & Yutaka Takahashi & Herwig Bruneel, 2016. "Retrial queues with balanced call blending: analysis of single-server and multiserver model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(2), pages 429-449, April.
    3. Efrosinin, Dmitry & Winkler, Anastasia, 2011. "Queueing system with a constant retrial rate, non-reliable server and threshold-based recovery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 594-605, May.
    4. Konstantin Avrachenkov & Evsey Morozov, 2014. "Stability analysis of GI/GI/c/K retrial queue with constant retrial rate," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 79(3), pages 273-291, June.
    5. Seyed Khodadadi & Fariborz Jolai, 2012. "A fuzzy based threshold policy for a single server retrial queue with vacations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(2), pages 281-297, June.
    6. B. Krishna Kumar & A. Thanikachalam & V. Kanakasabapathi & R. Rukmani, 2016. "Performance analysis of a multiprogramming–multiprocessor retrial queueing system with orderly reattempts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 319-364, December.
    7. Dmitry Efrosinin & Anastasia Winkler & Pinzger Martin, 2015. "Confidence Intervals for Performance Measures of M/M/1 Queue with Constant Retrial Policy," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(06), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Yang Song & Zaiming Liu & Yiqiang Q. Zhao, 2016. "Exact tail asymptotics: revisit of a retrial queue with two input streams and two orbits," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 97-120, December.
    9. Zhou, Wenhui & Zheng, Zhibin & Xie, Wei, 2017. "A control-chart-based queueing approach for service facility maintenance with energy-delay tradeoff," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 613-625.
    10. Sofiane Ouazine & Karim Abbas, 2016. "A functional approximation for retrial queues with two way communication," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 211-227, December.
    11. K. Avrachenkov & E. Morozov & B. Steyaert, 2016. "Sufficient stability conditions for multi-class constant retrial rate systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 149-171, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:24:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11750-016-0414-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.