IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v77y2021i4d10.1007_s11235-021-00780-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of DNS servers to build a benchmarking system of DNS64 implementations

Author

Listed:
  • Gábor Lencse

    (Széchenyi István University)

  • Attila Pivoda
  • Keiichi Shima

    (IIJ Innovation Institute Inc)

Abstract

DNS64 is an important IPv6 transition technology that facilitates the communication of an IPv6 only client with an IPv4 only server, which becomes a more and more common scenario. Several different DNS64 implementations exist, and their performance is a relevant decision factor for network operators. RFC 8219 has defined a benchmarking methodology for DNS64 servers, which requires the operation of an authoritative DNS server at 220% of the query rate used for DNS64 benchmarking. In this paper, we aim to build an authoritative DNS server that operates at 2.2 million qps (queries per second) rate, thus it facilitates DNS64 benchmarking up to 1,000,000 qps rate. To that end, we compare the performance of BIND, YADIFA, NSD, Knot DNS and FakeDNS (a special purpose software) to find the best suiting one of them. We fully disclose the details of our measurements including the configuration of the DNS implementations, the usage of our improved software tester called dns64perf ++, and the details of the hardware and software measurement environment in the NICT StarBED, Japan. We perform a series of measurements to examine, how the performance of the tested solutions scale up with the number of the active CPU cores from 1 to 32. Besides their performance, we also measure their memory consumption and zone load time. We present and discuss all the results. In addition to successfully building an authoritative DNS server with the required performance, we also make recommendations, which solutions suit to different special needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Gábor Lencse & Attila Pivoda & Keiichi Shima, 2021. "Performance evaluation of DNS servers to build a benchmarking system of DNS64 implementations," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 643-653, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:77:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11235-021-00780-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-021-00780-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-021-00780-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-021-00780-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gábor Lencse & Sándor Répás, 2016. "Performance analysis and comparison of four DNS64 implementations under different free operating systems," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 557-577, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Lencse, 2020. "Benchmarking stateless NAT64 implementations with a standard tester," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 245-257, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:77:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11235-021-00780-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.