IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v75y2020i3d10.1007_s11235-020-00681-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking stateless NAT64 implementations with a standard tester

Author

Listed:
  • G. Lencse

    (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)

Abstract

RFC 5180, the IPv6 update of RFC 2544, declared IPv6 transition technologies out of its scope. RFC 8219 defined a benchmarking methodology for IPv6 transition technologies including stateless NAT64 (more properly called SIIT) in the category of single translation solutions. Whereas several research papers have dealt with the performance of different stateful NAT64 implementations, none of them used RFC 8219 compliant measurements or addressed stateless NAT64 implementations. In this paper, we show, how stateless NAT64 implementations can be benchmarked carrying out the most important tests recommended by RFC 8219 without a special purpose NAT64 Tester, using simply an RFC 2544/RFC 5180 compliant legacy Tester. We carry out benchmarking measurements to examine the performance of three free software NAT64 implementations, namely: Jool, TAYGA and map646. All the details of our measurements are disclosed and their results are presented in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Lencse, 2020. "Benchmarking stateless NAT64 implementations with a standard tester," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 245-257, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:75:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-020-00681-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-020-00681-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-020-00681-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-020-00681-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gábor Lencse & Sándor Répás, 2016. "Performance analysis and comparison of four DNS64 implementations under different free operating systems," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 557-577, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gábor Lencse & Attila Pivoda & Keiichi Shima, 2021. "Performance evaluation of DNS servers to build a benchmarking system of DNS64 implementations," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 643-653, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:75:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-020-00681-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.