IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v60y2008i6d10.1007_bf03372807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dreierlei Einführungen in eine studienreformierte Betriebswirtschaftslehre

Author

Listed:
  • Dieter Schneider

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die Ausbildung zum Diplom-Kaufmann, Diplom-Ökonomen usw., ist in den letzten Jahren durch die Guillotine ministeriellen Zwanges hingerichtet worden. Aus den Blutlachen überkommener Lehrgebäude müssen Lehrbuchautoren versuchen, Rinnsale für verkürzte Bachelor- und Masterstudiengänge zu graben. Eines der zu lösenden probleme lautet: Welche Teile des bisher gängigen Stoffs für Diplomprüfungen, wie ihn „Einführungen in die Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre“ vorstellen, sind unverzichtbar, welche sollten wegen der verkürzten Regelstudienzeit bei der Ausbildung künftiger Bachelors oder Masters geopfert werden? Ein weiteres Problem ist, ob altüberkommene Sprachnachlässigkeiten bei Grundbegriffen in die Zukunft fortgeschrieben werden dürfen. Die drei hier zu besprechenden Einführungen in die Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre beziehen sich auf Bachelor- und Masterstudiengänge oder werben mit „Bachelor geeignet“ bereits auf dem Deckblatt. Sie beantworten diese Fragen in drastisch unterschiedlicher Weise.

Suggested Citation

  • Dieter Schneider, 2008. "Dreierlei Einführungen in eine studienreformierte Betriebswirtschaftslehre," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 601-611, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:60:y:2008:i:6:d:10.1007_bf03372807
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372807
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank H. Knight, 1944. "Realism and Relevance in the Theory of Demand," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52, pages 289-289.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Patinkin, 1995. "The training of an economist," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 48(195), pages 359-395.
    2. Miroslav Svoboda, 2008. "History and troubles of consumer surplus," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(3), pages 230-242.
    3. Jean-Sébastien Lenfant, 2006. "Complementarity and Demand Theory: From the 1920s to the 1940s," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 38(5), pages 48-85, Supplemen.
    4. Ivan Moscati, 2012. "How cardinal utility entered economic analysis during the Ordinal RevolutionLength: 31 pages," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf1205, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    5. D. Patinkin, 1995. "The training of an economist," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 48(195), pages 359-395.
    6. Edward R. Morey, 2018. "What are the ethics of welfare economics? And, are welfare economists utilitarians?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 65(2), pages 201-230, June.
    7. Vasil Stoyanov, 2018. "Empirical Testing of the Non-Satiation Axiom in the Consumer Choice Theory," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 3-38.
    8. Van Kooten, G. C., 1987. "The Economic Impacts on Consumers of Government Intervention in the Poultry and Egg Sectors: A Comparison of Alternative Welfare Measures," Working Papers 243873, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    9. D. Wade Hands, 2012. "The Rise and Fall of Walrasian Microeconomics: The Keynesian Effect," Chapters, in: Microfoundations Reconsidered, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Peter Galbács, 2019. "Friedman’s instrumentalism in F53. A Weberian reading," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 31-53, May.
    11. Emmett, Ross B., 2012. "Of talk, economics, love and innovation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 783-786.
    12. Galbács, Péter, 2017. "Max Weber és a modern makroökonómia újraértelmezése. Elméleti keret a kortárs makroökonómia módszertani elemzéséhez [Max Weber and reinterpretation of modern macroeconomics. A theoretical framework," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 285-304.
    13. Luca Fiorito & Sebastiano Nerozzi, 2016. "Chicago Economics in the Making, 1926-1940. A Further Look at US Interwar Pluralism," Department of Economics University of Siena 733, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    14. Luca Fiorito, 2015. "A Certain Amount of ‘Recantation'. On the Origins of Frank H. Knight’s Antipositivism," Department of Economics University of Siena 705, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    15. Mauro Boianovsky, 2005. "DENNIS ROBERTSON ON UTILITY AND WELFARE IN THE 1950s," Anais do XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 33rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 010, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    16. Jean-Sebastien Lenfant, 2012. "Indifference Curves and the Ordinalist Revolution," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 113-155, Spring.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:60:y:2008:i:6:d:10.1007_bf03372807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.