IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i7d10.1007_s11192-025-05370-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research productivity and novelty under different funding models: evidence from NIH-funded research projects

Author

Listed:
  • Linming Xu

    (Fujian University of Technology)

  • Baicun Li

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Shuo Chen

    (State University of New York College at Geneseo)

  • Meijuan Li

    (Fuzhou University)

Abstract

This study examines research productivity and novelty under different funding mechanisms of the National Institute of Health (NIH). We analyze two layers of funding relationships: (1) intramural versus extramural funding, comparing stable and competitive funding models, and (2) project grants versus cooperative agreements within extramural funding, assessing human capital input and financial investment. Our findings show that competitive extramural funding is associated with higher publication volumes, while stable intramural funding is linked to outputs with greater novelty. Within extramural mechanisms, cooperative agreements are associated with more publications than project grants, primarily due to larger collaborative group sizes rather than increased financial input. However, cooperative agreements are linked to lower research novelty, largely due to greater financial investment. These results highlight the importance of aligning human and financial resources to optimize research outcomes. A balanced approach between intramural and extramural funding mechanisms can support both productivity and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Linming Xu & Baicun Li & Shuo Chen & Meijuan Li, 2025. "Research productivity and novelty under different funding models: evidence from NIH-funded research projects," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3743-3771, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05370-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05370-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05370-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05370-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05370-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.