IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v126y2021i5d10.1007_s11192-021-03923-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How coupled are capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry?

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Ceribeli

    (University of São Paulo
    University of Copenhagen)

  • Henrique Ferraz de Arruda

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Luciano da Fontoura Costa

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

The understanding of how science works can contribute to making scientific development more effective. In this paper, we report an analysis of the organization and the interconnection between unbalanced areas of study. More specifically, we considered two important subareas in analytical chemistry, namely capillary electrophoresis (CE) and mass spectrometry (MS). These areas are particularly interesting because MS is employed in a bigger range of applications than CE. Consequently, these different portions of papers can interfere in the quality of the searches for papers devoted to CE–MS. Here, we considered a citation network in which the nodes and connections represent papers and citations, respectively. The network clusters were detected by employing the Infomap algorithm. By considering the clusters and the respective abstracts, the subjects were identified. Interesting results were found, including a marked separation between some clusters of articles devoted to instrumentation techniques and applications, which was quantified from the abstract contents. For instance, the most well-defined community was assigned as CE (Instru.), with 73.8% of the papers having abstracts that include the word “electrophoresis” and not the word “mass”. However, the papers that describe CE–MS did not lead to a well-defined cluster. In order to better understand the organization of the citation network, we considered a multi-scale analysis, in which we used the information regarding sub-clusters. Firstly, we analyzed the sub-cluster that contains the first article devoted to the coupling between CE and MS, whose subject was found to be a good representation of its sub-cluster. The second analysis was about the sub-cluster of a seminal paper known to be the first that dealt with protein analysis by using CE–MS and a similar result was obtained. By considering the proposed methodologies, our paper can contribute to researchers working with similar scenarios, since it shows that a given subject can be spread on many clusters of the network, therefore, lead to better literature reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Ceribeli & Henrique Ferraz de Arruda & Luciano da Fontoura Costa, 2021. "How coupled are capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3841-3851, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03923-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03923-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-021-03923-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-021-03923-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bornmann, Lutz & Marx, Werner & Schier, Hermann & Rahm, Erhard & Thor, Andreas & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2009. "Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published els," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 27-35.
    2. Henrique F. Arruda & Cesar H. Comin & Luciano da F. Costa, 2018. "How integrated are theoretical and applied physics?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1113-1121, August.
    3. Silva, Filipi N. & Amancio, Diego R. & Bardosova, Maria & Costa, Luciano da F. & Oliveira, Osvaldo N., 2016. "Using network science and text analytics to produce surveys in a scientific topic," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 487-502.
    4. Martin Rosvall & Carl T Bergstrom, 2010. "Mapping Change in Large Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, January.
    5. Bornmann, Lutz & Schier, Hermann & Marx, Werner & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2012. "What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 11-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Taimoor Khan & Nouman Azam & Shehzad Khalid & Furqan Aziz, 2022. "Hierarchical lifelong topic modeling using rules extracted from network communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Benatti, Alexandre & de Arruda, Henrique Ferraz & Silva, Filipi Nascimento & Comin, César Henrique & da Fontoura Costa, Luciano, 2023. "On the stability of citation networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    3. Benatti, Alexandre & Ferraz de Arrruda, Henrique & Nascimento Silva, Filipi & da Fontoura Costa, Luciano, 2021. "Enriching and analyzing small citation networks: A case study on transistor’s history," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benatti, Alexandre & de Arruda, Henrique Ferraz & Silva, Filipi Nascimento & Comin, César Henrique & da Fontoura Costa, Luciano, 2023. "On the stability of citation networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    2. Benatti, Alexandre & Ferraz de Arrruda, Henrique & Nascimento Silva, Filipi & da Fontoura Costa, Luciano, 2021. "Enriching and analyzing small citation networks: A case study on transistor’s history," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 573(C).
    3. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Jürgen Lerner, 2021. "The coauthorship networks of the most productive European researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 201-224, January.
    4. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    5. Shiji Chen & Clément Arsenault & Yves Gingras & Vincent Larivière, 2015. "Exploring the interdisciplinary evolution of a discipline: the case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1307-1323, February.
    6. Ajiferuke, Isola & Famoye, Felix, 2015. "Modelling count response variables in informetric studies: Comparison among count, linear, and lognormal regression models," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 499-513.
    7. Kong, Ling & Wang, Dongbo, 2020. "Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    8. Corrêa, Edilson A. & Marinho, Vanessa Q. & Amancio, Diego R., 2020. "Semantic flow in language networks discriminates texts by genre and publication date," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 557(C).
    9. Li, Jiang & Qiao, Lili & Li, Wenyuze & Jin, Yidan, 2014. "Chinese-language articles are not biased in citations: Evidences from Chinese-English bilingual journals in Scopus and Web of Science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 912-916.
    10. Ali Najmi & Taha H. Rashidi & Alireza Abbasi & S. Travis Waller, 2017. "Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 843-865, February.
    11. Jimi Adams & Ryan Light, 2014. "Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Urban Planning Academics: Tweets and Citations," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 146-153.
    13. Marie Katsurai & Shunsuke Ono, 2019. "TrendNets: mapping emerging research trends from dynamic co-word networks via sparse representation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1583-1598, December.
    14. Lutz Bornmann & Werner Marx, 2014. "How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 487-509, January.
    15. Mingyang Wang & Zhenyu Wang & Guangsheng Chen, 2019. "Which can better predict the future success of articles? Bibliometric indices or alternative metrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(3), pages 1575-1595, June.
    16. Chang, Yu-Wei, 2022. "Capability of non-English-speaking countries for securing a foothold in international journal publishing," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    17. Anqi Ma & Yu Liu & Xiujuan Xu & Tao Dong, 2021. "A deep-learning based citation count prediction model with paper metadata semantic features," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6803-6823, August.
    18. Nicola Melluso & Andrea Bonaccorsi & Filippo Chiarello & Gualtiero Fantoni, 2021. "Rapid detection of fast innovation under the pressure of COVID-19," Papers 2102.00197, arXiv.org.
    19. Chunli Wei & Jingyi Zhao & Jue Ni & Jiang Li, 2023. "What does open peer review bring to scientific articles? Evidence from PLoS journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2763-2776, May.
    20. Katchanov, Yurij L. & Markova, Yulia V., 2022. "Dynamics of senses of new physics discourse: Co-keywords analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03923-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.