IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v105y2015i1d10.1007_s11192-015-1669-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric analysis of research progress in membrane water treatment technology from 1985 to 2013

Author

Listed:
  • Yunrong Dai

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences)

  • Yonghui Song

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences)

  • Hongjie Gao

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences)

  • Siyu Wang

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences)

  • Yu Yuan

    (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences)

Abstract

Research progress in membrane water treatment technology during 1985–2013 was analyzed based on the bibliometric analysis of published papers in ISI Web of Science Core Collection (Science Citation Index-Expanded, SCI-E) database, and patents in Derwent Innovation Index database. The searched data (18,075 SCI papers and 19,182 patents) were statistically analyzed from different time, countries, research institutions, mainstream technologies and application industries. The results indicated that, the number of papers and patents on the membrane water treatment technology showed an increasing trend. The United States and China published the most SCI papers and patents in this field, respectively. China has become one of the major countries in this field, but the research level should be further improved. The research levels of the United States, Germany and France were in the international leading level in this field. Japan published a small quantity of SCI papers, but possessed many patents and ranked in second place. Moreover, the patentees of the top 10 all belonged to Japanese companies or enterprises. The mainstream technologies in the field of membrane water treatment included microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, pervaporation and liquid membrane. Among these technologies, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis and nanofiltration were the research hotspots in SCI papers, while reverse osmosis and liquid membrane were the research hotspots in patents. These mainstream technologies were mainly used for the treatment of drinking water and desalination of seawater or brackish water, and it is necessary to promote the application of membrane technologies in industrial wastewater treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunrong Dai & Yonghui Song & Hongjie Gao & Siyu Wang & Yu Yuan, 2015. "Bibliometric analysis of research progress in membrane water treatment technology from 1985 to 2013," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 577-591, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1669-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1669-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015-1669-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-015-1669-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabrizio Natale & Gianluca Fiore & Johann Hofherr, 2012. "Mapping the research on aquaculture. A bibliometric analysis of aquaculture literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(3), pages 983-999, March.
    2. Lihua Zhai & Yuntao Pan & Yu Guo & Zheng Ma & Fei Bi, 2014. "International comparative study on nanofiltration membrane technology based on relevant publications and patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1361-1374, November.
    3. Jiri Vanecek, 2008. "Bibliometric analysis of the Czech research publications from 1994 to 2005," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(2), pages 345-360, November.
    4. Li Ying Yang & Ting Yue & Jie Lan Ding & Tao Han, 2012. "A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(2), pages 497-516, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Tapia-Pacheco & Laura Liliana Villa-Vázquez & Miguel Ángel Pérez-Angón, 2021. "Research networks on the access of drinking water in Mexico City (2004–2018)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2557-2573, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Violaine Tatry & Dominique Fournier & Benoît Jeannequin & Françoise Dosba, 2014. "EU27 and USA leadership in fruit and vegetable research: a bibliometric study from 2000 to 2009," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2207-2222, March.
    2. Kaelo Mpho Ntwaepelo, 2021. "The Effects of Macroprudential and Monetary Policy Shocks in BRICS economies," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-20, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    3. Prabir G. Dastidar & Ajoy Mallik & Nripendranath Mandal, 2013. "Contribution of shrimp disease research to the development of the shrimp aquaculture industry: an analysis of the research and innovation structure across the countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(3), pages 659-674, December.
    4. Elizabeth C. Teixeira & Victor E. L. Silva & Nidia N. Fabré & Vandick S. Batista, 2020. "Marine shrimp fisheries research—a mismatch on spatial and thematic needs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 591-606, January.
    5. Jielan Ding & Per Ahlgren & Liying Yang & Ting Yue, 2018. "Disciplinary structures in Nature, Science and PNAS: journal and country levels," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1817-1852, September.
    6. Slavo Radosevic & Esin Yoruk, 2014. "Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1897-1924, December.
    7. Joon Hyung Cho & So Young Sohn, 0. "Competing risk model for predicting stabilization period of university spin-off ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    8. Yong Yi & Wei Qi & Dandan Wu, 2013. "Are CIVETS the next BRICs? A comparative analysis from scientometrics perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(2), pages 615-628, February.
    9. Tianlong Zheng & Juan Wang & Qunhui Wang & Chunhong Nie & Zhining Shi & Xiaona Wang & Zhen Gao, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis of micro/nano-bubble related research: current trends, present application, and future prospects," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 53-71, October.
    10. Dag W. Aksnes & Thed N. Leeuwen & Gunnar Sivertsen, 2014. "The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1391-1401, November.
    11. Jiri Vanecek, 2014. "The effect of performance-based research funding on output of R&D results in the Czech Republic," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 657-681, January.
    12. Ioan Ianoş & Alexandru-Ionuţ Petrişor, 2020. "An Overview of the Dynamics of Relative Research Performance in Central-Eastern Europe Using a Ranking-Based Analysis Derived from SCImago Data," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Maja Jokić & Krešimir Zauder & Srebrenka Letina, 2010. "Croatian scholarly productivity 1991–2005 measured by journals indexed in Web of Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(2), pages 375-395, May.
    14. Hu, Ya-Han & Tai, Chun-Tien & Liu, Kang Ernest & Cai, Cheng-Fang, 2020. "Identification of highly-cited papers using topic-model-based and bibliometric features: the consideration of keyword popularity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).
    15. Mervin Ogawa & Joseph Anthony L. Reyes, 2021. "Assessment of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations Efforts toward the Precautionary Approach and Science-Based Stock Management and Compliance Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Beibei Hu & Xianlei Dong & Chenwei Zhang & Timothy D. Bowman & Ying Ding & Staša Milojević & Chaoqun Ni & Erjia Yan & Vincent Larivière, 2015. "A lead-lag analysis of the topic evolution patterns for preprints and publications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2643-2656, December.
    17. Ivan Jarić & Jelena Knežević-Jarić & Mirjana Lenhardt, 2014. "Relative age of references as a tool to identify emerging research fields with an application to the field of ecology and environmental sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(2), pages 519-529, August.
    18. Ondřej Pecha & Jiří Vaněček, 2015. "Analysis of the Czech and Hungarian physiology publications 1994–2011," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 991-1003, November.
    19. Alexander Sokolov & Sergey Shashnov & Maxim Kotsemir, 2021. "From BRICS to BRICS plus: selecting promising areas of S&T Cooperation with developing countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 8815-8859, November.
    20. Ning Li, 2017. "Evolutionary patterns of national disciplinary profiles in research: 1996–2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(1), pages 493-520, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1669-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.