IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v13y2023i1d10.1134_s2079970523600208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of the Political Landscape of Moscow as Capital

Author

Listed:
  • V. A. Kolosov

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • M. V. Zotova

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Political landscape includes a wide range of tangible and intangible phenomena. The appearance of a capital is not only the political history of the state imprinted in buildings and monuments, but also a reflection of the ideas of the national elite about its social support, development prospects, the outside world, and diverse social ideas about space. Material objects, which shape urban environment, representative buildings of federal and regional authorities, monuments, and memorials play a special symbolic role as the dominant categories of the matrix of new representations. The objective of the present study is to trace the stages of evolution of the most important material elements of political landscape with a case study of monuments and buildings of government institutions in Moscow. The features of the modern distribution of government buildings and monuments in the city have been considered. The historical hyperconcentration of government buildings in or near the center of the capital has been confirmed. Two large areas of their high concentration have been identified: in the area of Lubyanka, Kitai-gorod, Staraya and Novaya squares and within the Moscow City business complex. Despite the transfer of a number of federal institutions outside the center, no noticeable spatial decentralization of the administrative functions of the capital has yet occurred. The geography of the monuments follows the general patterns of the capital’s layout. Their location reveals the radial-ring and sectoral structures of the city, as well as the specialization of individual districts. The undisputed dominant features of the landscape are monuments dedicated to the heroes and events of WWII (more than 40% of the total number of monuments), which constitute one of the pillars of modern Russian identity. The significance of many of the capital’s monuments is based on a powerful long-standing discourse. Despite the erection of monuments to rehabilitated public and political figures, victims of new wars and terrorist attacks, as well as monuments with Orthodox themes, the monument landscape of the capital has not changed radically during the post-Soviet period.

Suggested Citation

  • V. A. Kolosov & M. V. Zotova, 2023. "Evolution of the Political Landscape of Moscow as Capital," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 40-54, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970523600208
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970523600208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970523600208
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970523600208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pallot, Judith, 1999. "Land Reform in Russia, 1906-1917: Peasant Responses to Stolypin's Project of Rural Transformation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198206569, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. V. Zotova & A. G. Makhrova & O. B. Glezer, 2024. "Trends in Urban Studies in Russia: Topics in Light of the Current State of the Arts of Geography," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip C. Brown, 2021. "Sharing the Pain: Apportioning Natural Hazards Exposure in Early Modern Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Paul Castañeda Dower & Andrei Markevich, 2018. "Labor Misallocation and Mass Mobilization: Russian Agriculture during the Great War," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(2), pages 245-259, May.
    3. Chernina, Eugenia & Castañeda Dower, Paul & Markevich, Andrei, 2014. "Property rights, land liquidity, and internal migration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 191-215.
    4. Michael Kopsidis & Katja Bruisch & Daniel W. Bromley, 2013. "Where is the Backward Peasant? Regional Crop Yields on Common and Private Land in Russia 1883-1913," Working Papers 0046, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).
    5. Worobec, Christine, 2020. "The influences of A.V. Chayanov and Teodor Shanin on the English-language historiography of peasants in the Russian Empire," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 8-31.
    6. Castañeda Dower, Paul & Markevich, Andrei, 2014. "A history of resistance to privatization in Russia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 855-873.
    7. Steven Nafziger, 2016. "Communal property rights and land redistributions in Late Tsarist Russia," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 69(3), pages 773-800, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1134_s2079970523600208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.