Author
Abstract
One of the main goals of survey sampling is to estimate the population mean accurately, especially when working with uncertain data. In such situations, the traditional estimators frequently fail to retain robustness and accuracy, which calls for the development of more advanced estimation procedures. This study presents the robust neutrosophic exponential estimator to estimate the population mean under uncertainty employing simple random sampling (SRS). The suggested methods efficiently handle uncertain, inconsistent, and partial data by fusing the concepts of neutrosophy with the exponential estimators. We show through in-depth algebraic comparisons, simulation experiments, and real data illustrations that the proposed neutrosophic estimators not only improves robustness of the estimates but also offers improved accuracy in terms of least mean square error (MSE) and highest percent relative efficiency (PRE), when compared to the existing neutrosophic estimators namely, neutrosophic sample mean $$\bar{y}_N$$ y ¯ N , neutrosophic ratio estimator $$t_{r_N}$$ t r N , neutrosophic generalized ratio estimator $$t_{g_N}$$ t g N , neutrosophic regression estimator $$t_{lr_N}$$ t l r N , neutrosophic power ratio estimator $$t_{s_N}$$ t s N , neutrosophic exponential ratio estimator $$t_{bt_N}$$ t b t N , Tahir et al. (Complex Intell. Syst., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-521-00439-1 ) estimator $$t_{t_N}$$ t t N , Yadav and Smarandache (Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 53, 1-20, 2023) estimator $$t_{y_N}$$ t y N , and Yadav and Prasad (Interdiscip. Res. Perspect., 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2023.2267835 ) estimator $$t_{v_N}$$ t v N , particularly for datasets with high degrees of uncertainty. The results of this study provide a more trustworthy tool for survey practitioners working with uncertain data, and they have important implications for statistical techniques across different domains.
Suggested Citation
Priya & Anoop Kumar, 2025.
"Robust neutrosophic exponential estimators of population mean in the presence of uncertainty,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3827-3850, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02150-6
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-025-02150-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-025-02150-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.