IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v59y2025i1d10.1007_s11135-024-01991-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing transparency and methodological precision in variable measurement within organizational research: implications for validity

Author

Listed:
  • Elise Øby

    (Kristiania University College)

Abstract

This study addresses the call for enhanced transparency in methodological reporting by critically assessing methodological rigor and transparency, particularly in variable measurement, within primary cross-sectional survey-based research in organizational studies. Through a combined approach of scoping review for systematic literature identification and qualitative analysis, instances of inadequate reporting transparency and lack of methodological rigor are revealed. Analyzing data from 68 published studies, the findings highlight unclear construct definitions and a consistent absence of theoretical limitations when presenting study findings, pointing to a need for better reporting transparency. Additionally, the study uncovers the presence of elusive links between variable constructs and measures, and misplaced claims of prior validation for measurement instruments, indicating a lack of methodological rigor. Collectively, these findings challenge the interpretation and validity of research results, potentially leading to misconceptions and misinterpretations about what is known about the variable(s) in question. In turn, this may lead to researchers and practitioners basing their research or practice on flawed assumptions about what a group of studies is saying or indicating. While acknowledging prior recommendations on variable measurement and transparency, this study brings renewed focus to these areas. It also explores the role of measurement proficiency, debating whether the observed limitations reflect ethical concerns or are indicative of researchers’ capabilities in variable measurement, validity assessment, and reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Elise Øby, 2025. "Assessing transparency and methodological precision in variable measurement within organizational research: implications for validity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 489-506, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01991-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01991-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-024-01991-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-024-01991-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stéphane Brutus & Herman Aguinis & Ulrich Wassmer, 2013. "Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports : Analysis and Recommendations," Post-Print hal-02313051, HAL.
    2. Vijay Pereira, 2022. "Mapping the past, present, and future of ISMO: a scoping review leading to future research objectives," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 83-95, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeremy D. Mackey & Jeremy R. Brees & Charn P. McAllister & Michelle L. Zorn & Mark J. Martinko & Paul Harvey, 2018. "Victim and Culprit? The Effects of Entitlement and Felt Accountability on Perceptions of Abusive Supervision and Perpetration of Workplace Bullying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 659-673, December.
    2. Lorraine Eden & Bo Bernhard Nielsen, 2020. "Research methods in international business: The challenge of complexity," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1609-1620, December.
    3. João Barata & Paulo Rupino Cunha & António Dias Figueiredo, 2023. "Self-reporting Limitations in Information Systems Design Science Research," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(2), pages 143-160, April.
    4. Mahalaxmi Adhikariparajuli & Abeer Hassan & Benedetta Siboni, 2021. "CSR Implication and Disclosure in Higher Education: Uncovered Points. Results from a Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Jeremy D. Mackey & John D. Bishoff & Shanna R. Daniels & Wayne A. Hochwarter & Gerald R. Ferris, 2019. "Incivility’s Relationship with Workplace Outcomes: Enactment as a Boundary Condition in Two Samples," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 513-528, March.
    6. Tim Heubeck, 2024. "Looking back to look forward: a systematic review of and research agenda for dynamic managerial capabilities," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2243-2287, December.
    7. Herman Aguinis & Ravi S Ramani & Wayne F Cascio, 2020. "Methodological practices in international business research: An after-action review of challenges and solutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1593-1608, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:59:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-024-01991-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.