IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v52y2018i1d10.1007_s11135-017-0664-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opinions of classroom teachers on reading comprehension difficulties, inclusion education and co-teaching

Author

Listed:
  • Gönül Akçamete

    (Near East University)

  • Özlem Dağli Gökbulut

    (Near East University)

Abstract

In this paper, the opinions of elementary school teachers who have students with reading/understanding difficulties in their class on reading/understanding difficulties and providing education with special education teachers in the same classroom are examined. Teacher opinions are examined under three headings: “the problems/difficulties experienced by students with reading/understanding difficulties”, “the type and frequency of support needed by teachers in solving reading/understanding difficulties” and “opinions on serving in the same classroom with special education teacher”. In the literature, case study pattern which is a qualitative research pattern was employed. The study was based on purposive sampling and “convenience sampling” was used. All class teachers who participated in the study were employed at elementary schools in Nicosia, Famagusta, Kyrenia, Güzelyurt and İskele regions of Northern Cyprus. The measuring tool used in the study was “semi-structured interview form” prepared by researchers based on expert opinions. Obtained data were analysed using “content analysis” technique. According to the results of the study, classroom teachers state that students with reading/comprehension difficulties are having problems in understanding and interpreting the questions and directives as regards the text, making reading errors (adding, omitting, changing letters, pauses) and their language skills in Turkish and grammar problems affect all other courses negatively. It is also claimed that students are not interested in courses. It is found out that a majority of classroom teachers do not use any special strategy while working with students having these difficulties, but frequently felt the need to benefit from the experiences of special education teachers. In addition, different opinions were declared on “co-teaching” performed by special education teacher and classroom teachers in the same classroom. Based on the research findings, it is believed that although there are some positive opinions, classroom teachers are not ready to provide education in cooperation with special education teachers in the same classroom environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gönül Akçamete & Özlem Dağli Gökbulut, 2018. "Opinions of classroom teachers on reading comprehension difficulties, inclusion education and co-teaching," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 791-806, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0664-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0664-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-017-0664-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-017-0664-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdurrahman Uyanık & Cahit Nuri & Hakan Sarı, 2021. "On the Process of Understanding the Reading of Students with Mental Disabilities: An Examination of Teacher Practices," Journal of Education and Training Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 61-78, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:52:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11135-017-0664-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.