IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v47y2013i3p1511-1518.html

Applying structural equation modeling to report psychometric properties of Chinese version 10-item CES-D depression scale

Author

Listed:
  • Sen-Chi Yu

  • Yuan-Horng Lin

  • Wei-Hsin Hsu

Abstract

This study investigates the psychometric properties of Chinese-version short-form 10-item CES-D (i.e., CESD-10) in clinical depression patients and non-clinical college students by structural equation modeling approach. Several statistical procedures are applied to investigate the psychometric properties of CESD-10. First, the single factor model of CESD-10 shows merely mediocre fit due to “error term correlations”. The two pairs of error term correlations indicate that CESD-10 has redundant items and negative-worded effect. The revised model, based on the modification index, demonstrates good fit, and is adopted for subsequent analysis. Results of the SEM-based method show that configure invariance holds, while weak factorial invariance is not supported. A comparison the psychometric properties of the two groups shows that the clinical sample has better reliability, while the non-clinical sample has superior factorial validity. This finding confirms that the Chinese-version CESD-10 is most appropriate for the nonclinical, general population, although it is also valid for the clinically depressed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Sen-Chi Yu & Yuan-Horng Lin & Wei-Hsin Hsu, 2013. "Applying structural equation modeling to report psychometric properties of Chinese version 10-item CES-D depression scale," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1511-1518, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:3:p:1511-1518
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-011-9604-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-011-9604-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-011-9604-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoshio Takane & Jan Leeuw, 1987. "On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(3), pages 393-408, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Zhang & Xiangli Gu & Xiaoxia Zhang & Jihye Lee & Mei Chang & Tao Zhang, 2021. "Longitudinal Effects of Motivation and Physical Activity on Depressive Symptoms among College Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Juliet Honglei Chen & Meng Xuan Zhang & Chih-Hung Ko & Kwok Kit Tong & Shu M. Yu & Elvo Kuai Long Sou & Anise M. S. Wu, 2020. "The Development of a Screening Tool for Chinese Disordered Gamers: The Chinese Internet Gaming Disorder Checklist (C-IGDC)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Rainer W Alexandrowicz & Rebecca Jahn & Johannes Wancata, 2018. "Assessing the dimensionality of the CES-D using multi-dimensional multi-level Rasch models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Leeuw, Jan, 2006. "Principal component analysis of binary data by iterated singular value decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 21-39, January.
    2. Mark Reiser & Karl F. Schuessler, 1991. "A Hierarchy for Some Latent Structure Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 19(4), pages 419-465, May.
    3. Christoph T. Weiss, 2012. "Persistent Attitudes and Behaviors," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0143, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    4. Francesco Bartolucci & Ivonne Solis-Trapala, 2010. "Multidimensional Latent Markov Models in a Developmental Study of Inhibitory Control and Attentional Flexibility in Early Childhood," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 725-743, December.
    5. Molenaar, Dylan & Kő, Natasa & Rózsa, Sandor & Mészáros, Andrea, 2017. "Differentiation of cognitive abilities in the WAIS-IV at the item level," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 48-59.
    6. Yang Yixin & Lü Xin & Ma Jian & Qiao Han, 2014. "A Robust Factor Analysis Model for Dichotomous Data," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(5), pages 437-450, October.
    7. Lijuan Wang, 2010. "IRT–ZIP Modeling for Multivariate Zero-Inflated Count Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 671-692, December.
    8. Chun Wang & Steven W. Nydick, 2020. "On Longitudinal Item Response Theory Models: A Didactic," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(3), pages 339-368, June.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0181746 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Yong Luo & Khaleel Al-Harbi, 2016. "The Utility of the Bifactor Method for Unidimensionality Assessment When Other Methods Disagree," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, October.
    11. Jonas Moss & Steffen Grønneberg, 2023. "Partial Identification of Latent Correlations with Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 241-252, March.
    12. Thum, Anna-Elisabeth, 2013. "Psychology in econometric models: conceptual and methodological foundations," MPRA Paper 52293, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Michael Edwards, 2010. "A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach to Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(3), pages 474-497, September.
    14. Edward Haertel, 1990. "Continuous and discrete latent structure models for item response data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 477-494, September.
    15. Royce Anders & William Batchelder, 2015. "Cultural Consensus Theory for the Ordinal Data Case," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 151-181, March.
    16. April E. Cho & Jiaying Xiao & Chun Wang & Gongjun Xu, 2024. "Regularized Variational Estimation for Exploratory Item Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 347-375, March.
    17. Yikun Luo & Qipeng Chen & Jianyong Chen & Peida Zhan, 2024. "Development and validation of two shortened anxiety sensitive index-3 scales based on item response theory," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, December.
    18. Albert Maydeu-Olivares, 2001. "Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for paired comparison data under multiple judgment sampling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 209-227, June.
    19. Yang Liu, 2020. "A Riemannian Optimization Algorithm for Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation of High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 439-468, June.
    20. Mark Reiser, 1996. "Analysis of residuals for the multionmial item response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 509-528, September.
    21. Klaas Sijtsma & Jules L. Ellis & Denny Borsboom, 2024. "Rejoinder to McNeish and Mislevy: What Does Psychological Measurement Require?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1175-1185, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:3:p:1511-1518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.