IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v57y1992i2p217-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ordinal test fidelity estimated by an item sampling model

Author

Listed:
  • Norman Cliff
  • John Donoghue

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman Cliff & John Donoghue, 1992. "Ordinal test fidelity estimated by an item sampling model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 217-236, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:57:y:1992:i:2:p:217-236
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02294506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02294506
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02294506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norman Cliff, 1989. "Ordinal consistency and ordinal true scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 75-91, March.
    2. David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1984. "A response model for multiple choice items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 501-519, December.
    3. Norman Cliff, 1977. "A theory of consistency of ordering generalizable to tailored testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 375-399, September.
    4. Robert schulman & Richard Haden, 1975. "A test theory model for ordinal measurements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 40(4), pages 455-472, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartmann Scheiblechner, 1995. "Isotonic ordinal probabilistic models (ISOP)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 281-304, June.
    2. Herden, Gerhard & Pallack, Andreas, 2005. "Adequateness and interpretability of objective functions in ordinal data analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 19-69, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herden, Gerhard & Pallack, Andreas, 2005. "Adequateness and interpretability of objective functions in ordinal data analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 19-69, May.
    2. Norman Cliff, 1989. "Ordinal consistency and ordinal true scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 75-91, March.
    3. Laine Bradshaw & Jonathan Templin, 2014. "Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 403-425, July.
    4. Ulf Böckenholt, 2012. "The Cognitive-Miser Response Model: Testing for Intuitive and Deliberate Reasoning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 388-399, April.
    5. Kikumi Tatsuoka, 1984. "Caution indices based on item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 95-110, March.
    6. Klaas Sijtsma & Ivo Molenaar, 1987. "Reliability of test scores in nonparametric item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 79-97, March.
    7. Ivo Molenaar, 1998. "Data, model, conclusion, doing it again," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 315-340, December.
    8. Young-Sun Lee & Jeffrey Douglas & Betty Chewning, 2007. "Techniques For Developing Health Quality of Life Scales for Point of Service Use," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 331-350, September.
    9. Irini Moustaki & Martin Knott, 2000. "Generalized latent trait models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 391-411, September.
    10. Daniel Bolt & James Wollack & Youngsuk Suh, 2012. "Application of a Multidimensional Nested Logit Model to Multiple-Choice Test Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 339-357, April.
    11. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    12. David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1986. "A taxonomy of item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 567-577, December.
    13. William Strout, 1990. "A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 293-325, June.
    14. Robert Schulman, 1979. "Ordinal data: An alternative distribution," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(1), pages 3-20, March.
    15. Michal Abrahamowicz & James Ramsay, 1992. "Multicategorical spline model for item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 5-27, March.
    16. Henk Kelderman & Carl Rijkes, 1994. "Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 149-176, June.
    17. Javier Revuelta, 2010. "Estimating Difficulty from Polytomous Categorical Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 331-350, June.
    18. Robert Schulman, 1976. "Correlation and prediction in ordinal test theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(3), pages 329-340, September.
    19. Matthew D. Finkelman & Giles Hooker & Zhen Wang, 2010. "Prevalence and Magnitude of Paradoxical Results in Multidimensional Item Response Theory," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 744-761, December.
    20. David Budescu & Yuanchao Bo, 2015. "Analyzing Test-Taking Behavior: Decision Theory Meets Psychometric Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1105-1122, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:57:y:1992:i:2:p:217-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.