IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v51y1986i4p567-577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A taxonomy of item response models

Author

Listed:
  • David Thissen
  • Lynne Steinberg

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1986. "A taxonomy of item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 567-577, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:51:y:1986:i:4:p:567-577
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02295596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02295596
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02295596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Richardson, 1936. "The relation between the difficulty and the differential validity of a test," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 1(2), pages 33-49, June.
    2. David Thissen & Lynne Steinberg, 1984. "A response model for multiple choice items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(4), pages 501-519, December.
    3. David Andrich, 1982. "An extension of the rasch model for ratings providing both location and dispersion parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 105-113, March.
    4. Geofferey Masters, 1985. "A comparison of latent trait and latent class analyses of Likert-type data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 69-82, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henk Kelderman & Carl Rijkes, 1994. "Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polytomously scored items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 149-176, June.
    2. M.-L. Feddag, 2016. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for the normal ogive model with binary data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(2), pages 223-237, April.
    3. David Andrich, 1995. "Further remarks on nondichotomization of graded responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 37-46, March.
    4. Cristante, Francesca & Robusto, Egidio, 1999. "Assessing dependence among subjects' responses," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 259-274, November.
    5. Edward Haertel, 1990. "Continuous and discrete latent structure models for item response data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 477-494, September.
    6. Laine Bradshaw & Jonathan Templin, 2014. "Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 403-425, July.
    7. Ulf Böckenholt, 2012. "The Cognitive-Miser Response Model: Testing for Intuitive and Deliberate Reasoning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 388-399, April.
    8. Ivo Molenaar, 1998. "Data, model, conclusion, doing it again," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 315-340, December.
    9. Maurice Lorr, 1944. "Interrelationships of number-correct and limen scores for an amount-limit test," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(1), pages 17-30, March.
    10. Hubert Brogden, 1946. "Variation in test validity with variation in the distribution of item difficulties, number of items, and degree of their intercorrelation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 11(4), pages 197-214, December.
    11. Stefano Noventa & Luca Stefanutti & Giulio Vidotto, 2014. "An Analysis of Item Response Theory and Rasch Models Based on the Most Probable Distribution Method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 377-402, July.
    12. Irini Moustaki & Martin Knott, 2000. "Generalized latent trait models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 391-411, September.
    13. Daniel Bolt & James Wollack & Youngsuk Suh, 2012. "Application of a Multidimensional Nested Logit Model to Multiple-Choice Test Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 339-357, April.
    14. Bartolucci, Francesco & Bacci, Silvia & Gnaldi, Michela, 2014. "MultiLCIRT: An R package for multidimensional latent class item response models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 971-985.
    15. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    16. Matthias Davier & Ivo Molenaar, 2003. "A person-fit index for polytomous rasch models, latent class models, and their mixture generalizations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 213-228, June.
    17. Xie, Jing Chao & Xue, Peng & Mak, Cheuk Ming & Liu, Jia Ping, 2017. "Balancing energy and daylighting performances for envelope design: A new index and proposition of a case study in Hong Kong," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 13-22.
    18. Robert Wherry & Richard Gaylord, 1944. "Factor pattern of test items and tests as a function of the correlation coefficient: Content, difficulty, and constant error factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 9(4), pages 237-244, December.
    19. Charles Mosier & John McQuitty, 1940. "Methods of item validation and abacs for item-test correlation and critical ratio of upper-lower difference," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 5(1), pages 57-65, March.
    20. Frederic Lord, 1953. "An application of confidence intervals and of maximum likelihood to the estimation of an examinee's ability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 18(1), pages 57-76, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:51:y:1986:i:4:p:567-577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.