IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v6y2022i3d10.1007_s41669-021-00316-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health State Utilities for Adverse Events Associated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy A. Howell

    (Patient-Centered Research, Evidera)

  • Louis S. Matza

    (Patient-Centered Research, Evidera)

  • Monika P. Jun

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Jacob Garcia

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Annette Powers

    (Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • David G. Maloney

    (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center)

Abstract

Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy provides effective treatment for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Cost-utility analyses examining and comparing the value of these treatments require health state utilities representing key characteristics to differentiate among therapies. This study estimated utilities for adverse events (AEs) associated with CAR T-cell therapy, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs). Methods Health state vignettes were drafted based on literature review, AE reports from a trial of CAR T-cell therapy, and clinician input. Health states were valued in time trade-off interviews with general population participants in the UK. The first vignette described relapsed/refractory LBCL treated with CAR T-cell therapy without AEs. Five other vignettes had the same LBCL and treatment description, with the addition of an AE. Disutilities (i.e., utility decrease) associated with these AEs were calculated by subtracting the utility of the health state without AEs from those of the other health states. Results Interviews were completed with 218 participants (50% male; mean age 49 years). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) utility for CAR T-cell therapy without AEs was 0.73 (0.30). Mean (SD) disutilities associated with CRS were −0.01 (0.04) for grade 1, −0.05 (0.09) for grade 2, and −0.23 (0.24) for grade 3/4. Mean (SD) disutilities associated with NEs were −0.04 (0.07) for grade 1/2 and −0.18 (0.22) for grade 3/4. Conclusions More severe AEs were associated with greater disutilities. Health state utilities estimated in this study may be useful in cost-effectiveness models examining the value of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with LBCL.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy A. Howell & Louis S. Matza & Monika P. Jun & Jacob Garcia & Annette Powers & David G. Maloney, 2022. "Health State Utilities for Adverse Events Associated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 367-376, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-021-00316-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00316-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-021-00316-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-021-00316-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda D. Mackeigan & Bernie J. O'Brien & Paul I. Oh, 1999. "Holistic versus Composite Preferences for Lifetime Treatment Sequences for Type 2 Diabetes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(2), pages 113-120, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:6:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s41669-021-00316-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.