IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharmo/v3y2019i4d10.1007_s41669-019-0124-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cost Analysis of Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis for the Management of End-Stage Renal Failure At an Academic Hospital in Pretoria, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Letlhogonolo Makhele

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

  • Moliehi Matlala

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

  • Mncengeli Sibanda

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

  • Antony P. Martin

    (University of Liverpool Management School
    The Innovation Centre)

  • Brian Godman

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University
    University of Liverpool Management School
    University of Strathclyde
    Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge)

Abstract

Background Haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are commonly used treatments for the management of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The costs of managing these patients have grown in recent years with increasing rates of non-communicable diseases, which will adversely impact on national health budgets unless addressed. Currently, there is limited knowledge of the costs of ESRD within the public healthcare system in South Africa. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the direct costs of HD and PD in South Africa from a healthcare provider’s perspective. Methods A prospective, observational study was undertaken at a leading public hospital in South Africa. A micro-costing approach was applied to estimate healthcare costs using 46 adult patients with ESRD who had been receiving HD and PD for at least 3 months. Results The highest proportion of patients (35%) were aged 40–50 years. Patients aged 29–39 years were mostly on HD (28% vs. 21% on PD) while those aged 51–59 years mostly used PD (29% vs. 16% on HD). The average age of patients on HD and PD were 41 and 42 years, respectively. Fixed costs were the principal cost driver for HD ($16,231.45) while variable costs were the principal cost driver for PD (US$20,488.79). The annual cost of HD per patient (US$31,993.12) was higher than PD (US$25,282.00 per patient), even though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.816). Conclusion HD costs more than PD from the provider’s perspective. These cost estimates may be useful for carrying out future cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Letlhogonolo Makhele & Moliehi Matlala & Mncengeli Sibanda & Antony P. Martin & Brian Godman, 2019. "A Cost Analysis of Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis for the Management of End-Stage Renal Failure At an Academic Hospital in Pretoria, South Africa," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 631-641, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:3:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0124-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0124-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41669-019-0124-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41669-019-0124-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiona M. Clement (Nee Shrive) & William A. Ghali & Cam Donaldson & Braden J. Manns, 2009. "The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross‐costing approaches," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 377-388, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia Fischer & Susanne Mayer & Nataša Perić & Judit Simon, 2022. "Harmonization issues in unit costing of service use for multi-country, multi-sectoral health economic evaluations: a scoping review," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Richard Grieve & John Cairns & Simon G. Thompson, 2010. "Improving costing methods in multicentre economic evaluation: the use of multiple imputation for unit costs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(8), pages 939-954, August.
    3. Mareike Heimeshoff & Helge Hollmeyer & Jonas Schreyögg & Oliver Tiemann & Doris Staab, 2012. "Cost of Illness of Cystic Fibrosis in Germany," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(9), pages 763-777, September.
    4. Abdelbaste Hrifach & Coralie Brault & Sandrine Couray-Targe & Lionel Badet & Pascale Guerre & Christell Ganne & Hassan Serrier & Vanessa Labeye & Pierre Farge & Cyrille Colin, 2016. "Mixed method versus full top-down microcosting for organ recovery cost assessment in a French hospital group," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Chrysanthos D. Christou & Eleni C. Athanasiadou & Andreas I. Tooulias & Argyrios Tzamalis & Georgios Tsoulfas, 2022. "The process of estimating the cost of surgery: Providing a practical framework for surgeons," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1926-1940, July.
    6. Zuzana Špacírová & David Epstein & Leticia García-Mochón & Joan Rovira & Antonio Olry de Labry Lima & Jaime Espín, 2020. "A general framework for classifying costing methods for economic evaluation of health care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(4), pages 529-542, June.
    7. Grégoire Mercier & Gérald Naro, 2014. "Costing Hospital Surgery Services: The Method Matters," Post-Print hal-01829947, HAL.
    8. Kludacz-Alessandri Magdalena, 2020. "The Relationship between Cost System Functionality, Management Accounting Practices, and Hospital Performance," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 223-236, January.
    9. Alfredo Palacios & Carlos Rojas-Roque & Lucas González & Ariel Bardach & Agustín Ciapponi & Claudia Peckaitis & Andres Pichon-Riviere & Federico Augustovski, 2021. "Direct Medical Costs, Productivity Loss Costs and Out-Of-Pocket Expenditures in Women with Breast Cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 485-502, May.
    10. Xiao Xu & Christina M. Lazar & Jennifer Prah Ruger, 2021. "Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharmo:v:3:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s41669-019-0124-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.