IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v43y2025i5d10.1007_s40273-024-01467-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acceptance of Evidence Transfer Within German Early Benefit Assessment of New Drugs for Pediatric and Adolescents Target Populations

Author

Listed:
  • Georgia Pick

    (University of Cologne)

  • Dirk Müller

    (University of Cologne)

  • Charalabos-Markos Dintsios

    (Heinrich Heine University)

Abstract

Background and Objective In Germany, all new drugs undergo an early benefit assessment (EBA) by the decision-making body (G-BA). Due to limited access to clinical data in pediatric healthcare since 2017, evidence transfer has allowed for data from adult studies to be used in the EBA of pediatric drugs. This study examines the acceptance of evidence transfer, aiming to understand its correlation with granted added benefit. Methods By searching the G-BA database, relevant EBAs were identified. In addition to descriptive statistics, agreement statistics regarding binary and ordinal extent of added benefit and binary logistic regression with and without intercept were performed to investigate acceptance of evidence transfer, juxtaposing it with manufacturers’ claims, and to evaluate the impact of identified factors on evidence transfer. Results In 14 of 36 identified EBAs, the evidence transfer was accepted by the G-BA. They referred to four therapeutic areas, received a non-quantifiable added benefit and were subject to a pediatric investigation program. Non-quantifiable added benefit implies an added value in itself which can range from minor to major added benefit and is considering the genuine uncertainty mainly induced in theese EBAs due to evidence transfer, which is not allowing a quantification of an added benefit. The binary agreement between manufacturers’ claims and G-BA’s appraisals was less than by chance [kappa − 0.054 (− 0.158 to 0.050)] whereas the ordinal agreement became fair [kappa 0.333 (0.261–0.406)]. Congruence of the mechanism of action, alignment of disease pattern, transferability of efficacy and safety, and same comparator were fundamental for evidence transfer. Additionally, supportive evidence, therapeutic breakthroughs, and small-scale approval enhanced the acceptance of evidence transfer. The regression models yielded similar results showing different model fit and explained variance. Conclusions Evidence transfer hinges upon fulfilling various minimum criteria and additional supportive evidence. Availability of study data from adult or older patients and the pediatric group under evaluation is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgia Pick & Dirk Müller & Charalabos-Markos Dintsios, 2025. "Acceptance of Evidence Transfer Within German Early Benefit Assessment of New Drugs for Pediatric and Adolescents Target Populations," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 521-553, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01467-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01467-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-024-01467-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-024-01467-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:43:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s40273-024-01467-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.