IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v40y2022i10d10.1007_s40273-022-01175-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Bunka

    (University of British Columbia
    Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute)

  • Shahzad Ghanbarian

    (University of British Columbia
    Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute)

  • Linda Riches

    (Patient Partner)

  • Ginny Landry

    (Patient Partner)

  • Louisa Edwards

    (University of British Columbia
    Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute)

  • Alison M. Hoens

    (University of British Columbia
    Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences)

  • Stirling Bryan

    (University of British Columbia
    Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute)

Abstract

Background Partnering with patients can enrich the design and development of models of clinical care pathways, yet the practice is not commonplace. Guidelines or “best practices” for patient involvement in modeling are scarce. Objectives In this paper, we outline the steps we took to form an effective partnership with patients to design a robust microsimulation Markov model of major depressive disorder care pathways in British Columbia, Canada, with the aim of encouraging other teams to partner with patients in healthcare modeling endeavors. Methods We describe three unique phases of our collaborative process: uncertainty, mapping, and structured collaboration. We then explore the unique contributions the patient partners made, not only to the model itself, but to our process. Key perspectives are shared from both the modeler and the patient partners in their own words. Results The patient partners made distinct contributions by challenging and verifying modeling assumptions, noting limitations of the model, and suggesting areas for future research. Both the patient partners and the modelers saw great value in the partnership and agreed that the model was strengthened by the diversity of the team. Conclusions We present our learning and key recommendations for future modeling teams in the absence of tested frameworks. We encourage more widespread adoption of patient involvement in modeling and the development of guidelines for such work to increase the democracy of scientific decision making.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Bunka & Shahzad Ghanbarian & Linda Riches & Ginny Landry & Louisa Edwards & Alison M. Hoens & Stirling Bryan, 2022. "Collaborating with Patient Partners to Model Clinical Care Pathways in Major Depressive Disorder: The Benefits of Mixing Evidence and Lived Experience," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(10), pages 971-977, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01175-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01175-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-022-01175-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-022-01175-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:40:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s40273-022-01175-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.