IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v15y2022i5d10.1007_s40271-022-00573-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Comparability of Face-to-Face Versus Video Conference-Based Composite Time Trade-Off Interviews: Insights from EQ-5D-Y-3L Valuation Studies in Belgium and Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Anabel Estévez-Carrillo

    (Maths in Health)

  • Sarah Dewilde

    (Services in Health Economics)

  • Mark Oppe

    (Maths in Health)

  • Juan M. Ramos-Goñi

    (Maths in Health)

Abstract

Background Face-to-face interviews are recommended for the collection of composite time trade-off (cTTO) data. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) social distancing measures made researchers consider videoconferencing interviews as an alternative mode of administration, but little evidence about the implementation of videoconferencing in valuation studies is available. This study provides insights into the effect of videoconferencing on the quality of data, evaluating interviewers’ and respondents’ engagement level in videoconferences compared with face-to-face interviews. Methods We used cTTO data collected in Belgium and Spain following the EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, both projects interrupted the face-to-face data collection before reaching the target sample. The remaining interviews were conducted by videoconference. We compared both modes of administration in terms of interviewers’ engagement (task duration and number of moves in each example) and respondents’ engagement (task duration and proportions of specific response values, in half-year units). To minimise interviewers’ learning effects, we split our sample into three groups: (1) first 20 interviews conducted face-to-face; (2) subsequent interviews conducted face-to-face; and (3) videoconferencing interviews. Results The comparison between videoconferencing and subsequent face-to-face interviews showed the interviewer’s engagement was not affected by the mode of administration as almost no significant results were found either in the task duration or the numbers of moves shown in the examples. Similarly, none of the respondents’ task duration or proportion of specific responses or half-year units were affected by the mode of administration in either of the two countries. Conclusions No evidence suggested that the quality of cTTO data is reduced when using videoconferencing compared with face-to-face interviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Anabel Estévez-Carrillo & Sarah Dewilde & Mark Oppe & Juan M. Ramos-Goñi, 2022. "Exploring the Comparability of Face-to-Face Versus Video Conference-Based Composite Time Trade-Off Interviews: Insights from EQ-5D-Y-3L Valuation Studies in Belgium and Spain," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 15(5), pages 521-535, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:15:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00573-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00573-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-022-00573-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-022-00573-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peasgood, Tessa & Bourke, Mackenzie & Devlin, Nancy & Rowen, Donna & Yang, Yaling & Dalziel, Kim, 2023. "Randomised comparison of online interviews versus face-to-face interviews to value health states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:15:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00573-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.