IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i4d10.1007_s40271-017-0214-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me”: A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care

Author

Listed:
  • Jerôme Jean Jacques Dongen

    (Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
    Maastricht University
    Zuyd University of Applied Sciences)

  • Maarten Wit

    (VU University Medical Center)

  • Hester Wilhelmina Henrica Smeets

    (Zuyd University of Applied Sciences)

  • Esther Stoffers

    (Huis voor de Zorg)

  • Marloes Amantia Bokhoven

    (Maastricht University)

  • Ramon Daniëls

    (Zuyd University of Applied Sciences
    Zuyd University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Background The number of people with multiple chronic conditions receiving primary care services is growing. To deal with their increasingly complex health care demands, professionals from different disciplines need to collaborate. Interprofessional team (IPT) meetings are becoming more popular. Several studies describe important factors related to conducting IPT meetings, mostly from a professional perspective. However, in the light of patient-centeredness, it is valuable to also explore the patients’ perspective. Objective The aim was to explore the patients’ perspectives regarding IPT meetings in primary care. Methods A qualitative study with a focus group design was conducted in the Netherlands. Two focus group meetings took place, for which the same patients were invited. The participants, chronically ill patients with experience on interprofessional collaboration, were recruited through the regional patient association. Participants discussed viewpoints, expectations, and concerns regarding IPT meetings in two rounds, using a focus group protocol and selected video-taped vignettes of team meetings. The first meeting focused on conceptualization and identification of themes related to IPT meetings that are important to patients. The second meeting aimed to gain more in-depth knowledge and understanding of the priorities. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by means of content analysis. Results The focus group meetings included seven patients. Findings were divided into six key categories, capturing the factors that patients found important regarding IPT meetings: (1) putting the patient at the center, (2) opportunities for patients to participate, (3) appropriate team composition, (4) structured approach, (5) respectful communication, and (6) informing the patient about meeting outcomes. Conclusions Patients identified different elements regarding IPT meetings that are important from their perspective. They emphasized the right of patients or their representatives to take part in IPT meetings. Results of this study can be used to develop tools and programs to improve interprofessional collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerôme Jean Jacques Dongen & Maarten Wit & Hester Wilhelmina Henrica Smeets & Esther Stoffers & Marloes Amantia Bokhoven & Ramon Daniëls, 2017. "“They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me”: A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 429-438, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0214-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0214-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0214-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0214-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Palapal Sy & Arden Panotes & Daniella Cho & Roi Charles Pineda & Priya Martin, 2022. "A Rapid Review of the Factors That Influence Service User Involvement in Interprofessional Education, Practice, and Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0214-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.