IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16826-d1003935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Rapid Review of the Factors That Influence Service User Involvement in Interprofessional Education, Practice, and Research

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Palapal Sy

    (National Teacher Training Center for the Health Professions, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines)

  • Arden Panotes

    (National Teacher Training Center for the Health Professions, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines)

  • Daniella Cho

    (Faculty of Medicine, Rural Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia)

  • Roi Charles Pineda

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Priya Martin

    (Faculty of Medicine, Rural Clinical School, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
    Health and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4067, Australia)

Abstract

Service user involvement in interprofessional education and collaborative practice remains limited despite the increasing push for this by governments and grant funding bodies. This rapid review investigated service user involvement in interprofessional education, practice, and research to determine factors that enable or hinder such involvement. Following the Cochrane and the World Health Organization’s rapid review guidelines, a targeted search was undertaken in four databases. Subsequent to the screening processes, included papers were critically appraised, and extracted data were synthesized narratively. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies were related to interprofessional collaborative practice, as opposed to education and research. Service user involvement was more in the form of consultation and collaboration, as opposed to consumer-led partnerships. Enablers and barriers to service user involvement in IPECP were identified. Enablers included structure, the valuing of different perspectives, and relationships. Barriers included time and resources, undesirable characteristics, and relationships. This rapid review has added evidence to a swiftly expanding field, providing timely guidance. Healthcare workers can benefit from targeted training. Policy makers, healthcare organizations, and governments can investigate strategies to mitigate the time and resource challenges that impede service user involvement in IPECP.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Palapal Sy & Arden Panotes & Daniella Cho & Roi Charles Pineda & Priya Martin, 2022. "A Rapid Review of the Factors That Influence Service User Involvement in Interprofessional Education, Practice, and Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16826-:d:1003935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16826/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16826/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerôme Jean Jacques Dongen & Maarten Wit & Hester Wilhelmina Henrica Smeets & Esther Stoffers & Marloes Amantia Bokhoven & Ramon Daniëls, 2017. "“They Are Talking About Me, but Not with Me”: A Focus Group Study to Explore the Patient Perspective on Interprofessional Team Meetings in Primary Care," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 429-438, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16826-:d:1003935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.