IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v84y2016i3d10.1007_s11069-016-2505-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of observed and predicted ground motions from the 2015 MW7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake

Author

Listed:
  • Susan E. Hough

    (United States Geological Survey (USGS))

  • Stacey S. Martin

    (Nanyang Technological University)

  • Vineet Gahalaut

    (Ministry of Earth Sciences)

  • Anand Joshi

    (Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Roorkee)

  • M. Landes

    (c/o Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique Centre DAM Ile de France)

  • R. Bossu

    (c/o Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique Centre DAM Ile de France)

Abstract

We use 21 strong motion recordings from Nepal and India for the 25 April 2015 moment magnitude (MW) 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake together with the extensive macroseismic intensity data set presented by Martin et al. (Seism Res Lett 87:957–962, 2015) to analyse the distribution of ground motions at near-field and regional distances. We show that the data are consistent with the instrumental peak ground acceleration (PGA) versus macroseismic intensity relationship developed by Worden et al. (Bull Seism Soc Am 102:204–221, 2012), and use this relationship to estimate peak ground acceleration from intensities (PGAEMS). For nearest-fault distances (RRUP 200 km), instrumental PGA values are consistent with this GMPE, while PGAEMS is systematically higher. We suggest the latter reflects a duration effect whereby effects of weak shaking are enhanced by long-duration and/or long-period ground motions from a large event at regional distances. We use PGAEMS values within 200 km to investigate the variability of high-frequency ground motions using the Atkinson and Boore (Bull Seism Soc Am 93:1703–1729, 2003) GMPE as a baseline. Across the near-field region, PGAEMS is higher by a factor of 2.0–2.5 towards the northern, down-dip edge of the rupture compared to the near-field region nearer to the southern, up-dip edge of the rupture. Inferred deamplification in the deepest part of the Kathmandu valley supports the conclusion that former lake-bed sediments experienced a pervasive nonlinear response during the mainshock (Dixit et al. in Seismol Res Lett 86(6):1533–1539, 2015; Rajaure et al. in Tectonophysics, 2016. Ground motions were significantly amplified in the southern Gangetic basin, but were relatively low in the northern basin. The overall distribution of ground motions and damage during the Gorkha earthquake thus reflects a combination of complex source, path, and site effects. We also present a macroseismic intensity data set and analysis of ground motions for the MW7.3 Dolakha aftershock on 12 May 2015, which we compare to the Gorkha mainshock and conclude was likely a high stress-drop event.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan E. Hough & Stacey S. Martin & Vineet Gahalaut & Anand Joshi & M. Landes & R. Bossu, 2016. "A comparison of observed and predicted ground motions from the 2015 MW7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1661-1684, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:84:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2505-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2505-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2505-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-016-2505-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hemchandra Chaulagain & Hugo Rodrigues & Vitor Silva & Enrico Spacone & Humberto Varum, 2015. "Seismic risk assessment and hazard mapping in Nepal," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 583-602, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenhao Shen & Dinghui Yang & Xiwei Xu & Shuxin Yang & Shaolin Liu, 2022. "3D simulation of ground motion for the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal, based on the spectral element method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(3), pages 2853-2871, July.
    2. Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh & Hongwei Wang, 2022. "Aftershock ground motion characteristics during the 2012 Varzaghan–Ahar doublet events, northwest of Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2579-2599, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajesh Khatakho & Dipendra Gautam & Komal Raj Aryal & Vishnu Prasad Pandey & Rajesh Rupakhety & Suraj Lamichhane & Yi-Chung Liu & Khameis Abdouli & Rocky Talchabhadel & Bhesh Raj Thapa & Rabindra Adhi, 2021. "Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Chen, Weiyi & Zhang, Limao, 2021. "Resilience assessment of regional areas against earthquakes using multi-source information fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Masoud Mojarab & Nazi Norouzi & Mahdokht Bayati & Zeinab Asadi & Mohamad Eslami & Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany & Abdul-Latif Helaly & Sara Khoshnevis, 2023. "Assessment of seismic hazard including equivalent-linear soil response analysis for Dhaka Metropolitan Region, Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 3145-3180, July.
    4. Wilson, Bradley, 2020. "Evaluating the INLA-SPDE approach for Bayesian modeling of earthquake damages from geolocated cluster data," Earth Arxiv 64whm, Center for Open Science.
    5. Tara Nidhi Bhattarai & Takasi Nagao & Tara Nidhi Lohani, 2020. "State of Seismic Hazard Analysis: Reviewing the Needs after Mw 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake," Journal of Development Innovations, KarmaQuest International, vol. 4(1), pages 48-63, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:84:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2505-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.