IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v81y2016i1d10.1007_s11069-015-2084-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for the variability of rock detachment conditions in designing rockfall protection structures

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Bourrier

    (Irstea, UR EMGR
    Univ. Grenoble Alpes (UGA))

  • Julien Baroth

    (Univ. Grenoble Alpes (UGA)
    3SR, CNRS UMR 5521)

  • Stéphane Lambert

    (Irstea, UR ETGR
    Univ. Grenoble Alpes (UGA))

Abstract

This study is based on the analysis of the residual rockfall hazard at the elements at risk and accounts for the variability of the rock release parameters influencing the trajectory. The design of protection structures is conducted in two phases: a functional design phase consisting of quantifying the structure height from the rock passing height distribution and a structural design phase where the structure required capacity is assessed from the rock passing energy distribution. This framework is used on a well-documented study site for identifying the effects of the definition of the rocks release conditions, limited to the rock volume and falling height, on the design and efficiency of protection fences. The rock volume is modeled using a random variable, with different probabilistic laws. A probabilistic method is also used to analyze the effect of the rock volume distribution. These sensitivity analyses are conducted using a point estimate method for saving computation time. In this work, the initial falling height is shown to have a negligible influence on both the functional and structural designs of the fence. On the contrary, the rock volume range appears to be the leading parameter. The influence of the distribution law is shown to be of second order. The proposed approach may be extrapolated to other uncertain or variable parameters, as well as to other types of passive rockfall protective structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Bourrier & Julien Baroth & Stéphane Lambert, 2016. "Accounting for the variability of rock detachment conditions in designing rockfall protection structures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 365-385, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:81:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-015-2084-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-2084-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-015-2084-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-015-2084-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudia Mignelli & Stefano Russo & Daniele Peila, 2012. "ROckfall risk MAnagement assessment: the RO.MA. approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1109-1123, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniele Giordan & Martina Cignetti & Danilo Godone & Davide Bertolo & Marco Paganone, 2021. "Definition of an Operative Methodology for the Management of Rockfalls along with the Road Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Simone Mineo & Giovanna Pappalardo & Michele Mangiameli & Santo Campolo & Giuseppe Mussumeci, 2018. "Rockfall Analysis for Preliminary Hazard Assessment of the Cliff of Taormina Saracen Castle (Sicily)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Franck Bourrier & Julien Baroth & Stéphane Lambert, 2016. "Accounting for the variability of rock detachment conditions in designing rockfall protection structures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 365-385, March.
    4. Claudia Mignelli & Daniele Peila & Stefano Lo Russo & Sara Ratto & Massimo Broccolato, 2014. "Analysis of rockfall risk on mountainside roads: evaluation of the effect of protection devices," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(1), pages 23-35, August.
    5. Reza Nassirzadeh Goorchi & Mehdi Amini & Hossein Memarian, 2018. "A new rating system approach for risk analysis of rock slopes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 75-102, April.
    6. Valerio De Biagi & Maria Lia Napoli & Monica Barbero, 2017. "A quantitative approach for the evaluation of rockfall risk on buildings," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(2), pages 1059-1086, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:81:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-015-2084-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.