IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v102y2020i3d10.1007_s11069-020-03915-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of earthquake recurrence networks: the cases of 2014 and 2015 aftershock sequences in Ionian Islands, Greece

Author

Listed:
  • D. Chorozoglou

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)

  • E. Papadimitriou

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki)

Abstract

The investigation of earthquake recurrence networks that were constructed from two aftershock sequences in Greece, is performed, aiming to detect whether the structure of networks became distinct (non-random) before the occurrence of either the main shock or a major (strong) aftershock. The network nodes are the time series observations, which are the aftershocks magnitudes. Their binary connections are given by the arbitrary threshold $$\varepsilon$$ ε on the recurrence matrix, which is computed with the Heaviside function. Two aftershock sequences are the 2014 Kefalonia doublet, main shocks ( $$M = 6.1$$ M = 6.1 and $$M = 6.0$$ M = 6.0 ), and the 2015 Lefkada main shock ( $$M = 6.5$$ M = 6.5 ) sequence. The earthquake networks are formed for three different thresholds of $$\varepsilon$$ ε , for monitoring eight basic network measures and non-trivial properties such as the small world and scale free, and examining their structure during the evolution of the sequences. To assess whether the values of the eight network measures are statistically significant and the network gets non-trivial properties are present, the construction of randomized networks is required and then the comparison of the randomized network values with the ones from the original recurrence networks. The monitoring of network measures reveals that their original values diverge from the statistical significance, i.e., the structure of networks is random, immediately after the main shocks and shortly before the occurrence of the strongest aftershocks. On the contrary, in the intervening time, between the occurrences of main shocks and strongest aftershocks, their original values are statistically significant, which means that reveal the distinct network structure. The small-world and scale-free properties are sought but not revealed.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Chorozoglou & E. Papadimitriou, 2020. "Investigation of earthquake recurrence networks: the cases of 2014 and 2015 aftershock sequences in Ionian Islands, Greece," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 783-805, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:102:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-020-03915-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-03915-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-03915-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-03915-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Abe & N. Suzuki, 2007. "Dynamical evolution of clustering in complex network of earthquakes," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 59(1), pages 93-97, September.
    2. Chorozoglou, D. & Kugiumtzis, D. & Papadimitriou, E., 2018. "Testing the structure of earthquake networks from multivariate time series of successive main shocks in Greece," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 28-39.
    3. Charo I Del Genio & Hyunju Kim & Zoltán Toroczkai & Kevin E Bassler, 2010. "Efficient and Exact Sampling of Simple Graphs with Given Arbitrary Degree Sequence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chorozoglou, D. & Papadimitriou, E. & Kugiumtzis, D., 2019. "Investigating small-world and scale-free structure of earthquake networks in Greece," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 143-152.
    2. He, Xuan & Zhao, Hai & Cai, Wei & Li, Guang-Guang & Pei, Fan-Dong, 2015. "Analyzing the structure of earthquake network by k-core decomposition," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 34-43.
    3. Bryan S. Graham, 2015. "Methods of Identification in Social Networks," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 465-485, August.
    4. Zhang, Linjun & Small, Michael & Judd, Kevin, 2015. "Exactly scale-free scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 182-197.
    5. Xu, Yanjie & Ren, Tao & Liu, Yiyang & Li, Zhe, 2018. "Earthquake prediction based on community division," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 969-974.
    6. Qing Cai & Mahardhika Pratama & Sameer Alam, 2019. "Interdependency and Vulnerability of Multipartite Networks under Target Node Attacks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, November.
    7. G.-Fivos Sargentis & Theano Iliopoulou & Stavroula Sigourou & Panayiotis Dimitriadis & Demetris Koutsoyiannis, 2020. "Evolution of Clustering Quantified by a Stochastic Method—Case Studies on Natural and Human Social Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Rezaei, Soghra & Darooneh, Amir Hossein & Lotfi, Nastaran & Asaadi, Nazila, 2017. "The earthquakes network: Retrieving the empirical seismological laws," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 80-87.
    9. Andrin Pelican & Bryan S. Graham, 2020. "An Optimal Test for Strategic Interaction in Social and Economic Network Formation between Heterogeneous Agents," NBER Working Papers 27793, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Lotfi, Nastaran & Darooneh, Amir H., 2013. "Nonextensivity measure for earthquake networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(14), pages 3061-3065.
    11. Stephan Bialonski & Martin Wendler & Klaus Lehnertz, 2011. "Unraveling Spurious Properties of Interaction Networks with Tailored Random Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Rezaei, Soghra & Moghaddasi, Hanieh & Darooneh, Amir Hossein, 2018. "Preferential attachment in evolutionary earthquake networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 495(C), pages 172-179.
    13. Shaun Lichter & Christopher Griffin & Terry Friesz, 2023. "The Calculation and Simulation of the Price of Anarchy for Network Formation Games," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 581-610, September.
    14. Chorozoglou, D. & Kugiumtzis, D. & Papadimitriou, E., 2018. "Testing the structure of earthquake networks from multivariate time series of successive main shocks in Greece," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 28-39.
    15. Ferreira, Douglas S.R. & Ribeiro, Jennifer & Oliveira, Paulo S.L. & Pimenta, André R. & Freitas, Renato P. & Papa, Andrés R.R., 2020. "Long-range correlation studies in deep earthquakes global series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    16. Deyasi, Krishanu & Chakraborty, Abhijit & Banerjee, Anirban, 2017. "Network similarity and statistical analysis of earthquake seismic data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 481(C), pages 224-234.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:102:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-020-03915-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.