IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v26y2020i2d10.1007_s10985-019-09475-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Penalized full likelihood approach to variable selection for Cox’s regression model under nested case–control sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Jie-Huei Wang

    (National Health Research Institutes
    Academia Sinica)

  • Chun-Hao Pan

    (Academia Sinica)

  • I-Shou Chang

    (National Health Research Institutes
    National Health Research Institutes)

  • Chao Agnes Hsiung

    (National Health Research Institutes)

Abstract

Assuming Cox’s regression model, we consider penalized full likelihood approach to conduct variable selection under nested case–control (NCC) sampling. Penalized non-parametric maximum likelihood estimates (PNPMLEs) are characterized by self-consistency equations derived from score functions. A cross-validation method based on profile likelihood is used to choose the tuning parameter within a family of penalty functions. Simulation studies indicate that the numerical performance of (P)NPMLE is better than weighted partial likelihood in estimating the log-relative risk and in identifying the covariates and the model, under NCC sampling. LASSO performs best when cohort size is small; SCAD performs best when cohort size is large and may eventually perform as well as the oracle estimator. Using the SCAD penalty, we establish the consistency, asymptotic normality, and oracle properties of the PNPMLE, as well as the sparsity property of the penalty. We also propose a consistent estimate of the asymptotic variance using observed profile likelihood. Our method is illustrated to analyze the diagnosis of liver cancer among those in a type 2 diabetic mellitus dataset who were treated with thiazolidinediones in Taiwan.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie-Huei Wang & Chun-Hao Pan & I-Shou Chang & Chao Agnes Hsiung, 2020. "Penalized full likelihood approach to variable selection for Cox’s regression model under nested case–control sampling," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 292-314, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:26:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10985-019-09475-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-019-09475-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-019-09475-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-019-09475-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    2. Thomas H. Scheike & Torben Martinussen, 2004. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Cox's Regression Model Under Case–Cohort Sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(2), pages 283-293, June.
    3. Kani Chen, 2001. "Generalized case–cohort sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(4), pages 791-809.
    4. Zhao, Sihai Dave & Li, Yi, 2012. "Principled sure independence screening for Cox models with ultra-high-dimensional covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 397-411.
    5. Ørnulf Borgan & Ying Zhang, 2015. "Using cumulative sums of martingale residuals for model checking in nested case‐control studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 696-703, September.
    6. Ai Ni & Jianwen Cai & Donglin Zeng, 2016. "Variable selection for case-cohort studies with failure time outcome," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(3), pages 547-562.
    7. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    8. Sihai Dave Zhao & Yi Li, 2014. "Score test variable screening," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 862-871, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Zhang & Haibo Zhou & Yanyan Liu & Jianwen Cai, 2021. "Conditional screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data in case-cohort studies," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 632-661, October.
    2. He, Kevin & Kang, Jian & Hong, Hyokyoung G. & Zhu, Ji & Li, Yanming & Lin, Huazhen & Xu, Han & Li, Yi, 2019. "Covariance-insured screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 100-114.
    3. Jing Zhang & Haibo Zhou & Yanyan Liu & Jianwen Cai, 2021. "Feature screening for case‐cohort studies with failure time outcome," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 349-370, March.
    4. Zhang, Shucong & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "Variable screening for ultrahigh dimensional heterogeneous data via conditional quantile correlations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Chen, Xiaolin & Chen, Xiaojing & Wang, Hong, 2018. "Robust feature screening for ultra-high dimensional right censored data via distance correlation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 118-138.
    6. Zhong, Wei & Wang, Jiping & Chen, Xiaolin, 2021. "Censored mean variance sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Tang, Niansheng & Xia, Linli & Yan, Xiaodong, 2019. "Feature screening in ultrahigh-dimensional partially linear models with missing responses at random," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 208-227.
    8. Hong, Hyokyoung G. & Zheng, Qi & Li, Yi, 2019. "Forward regression for Cox models with high-dimensional covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 268-290.
    9. Liming Wang & Xingxiang Li & Xiaoqing Wang & Peng Lai, 2022. "Unified mean-variance feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1887-1918, September.
    10. Jing Zhang & Guosheng Yin & Yanyan Liu & Yuanshan Wu, 2018. "Censored cumulative residual independent screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 273-292, April.
    11. Liu, Zhongkai & Song, Rui & Zeng, Donglin & Zhang, Jiajia, 2017. "Principal components adjusted variable screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 134-144.
    12. Xia, Xiaochao & Yang, Hu & Li, Jialiang, 2016. "Feature screening for generalized varying coefficient models with application to dichotomous responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 85-97.
    13. Jing Zhang & Yanyan Liu & Hengjian Cui, 2021. "Model-free feature screening via distance correlation for ultrahigh dimensional survival data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 2711-2738, December.
    14. Zhang, Jing & Liu, Yanyan & Wu, Yuanshan, 2017. "Correlation rank screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 121-132.
    15. Jianglin Fang, 2021. "Feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data when failure indicators are missing at random," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1141-1166, June.
    16. Zhang, Shen & Zhao, Peixin & Li, Gaorong & Xu, Wangli, 2019. "Nonparametric independence screening for ultra-high dimensional generalized varying coefficient models with longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 37-52.
    17. Liu, Yanyan & Zhang, Jing & Zhao, Xingqiu, 2018. "A new nonparametric screening method for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 74-85.
    18. Xiaolin Chen & Yi Liu & Qihua Wang, 2019. "Joint feature screening for ultra-high-dimensional sparse additive hazards model by the sparsity-restricted pseudo-score estimator," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1007-1031, October.
    19. Xiangyu Wang & Chenlei Leng, 2016. "High dimensional ordinary least squares projection for screening variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(3), pages 589-611, June.
    20. Meng An & Haixiang Zhang, 2023. "High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis for Time-to-Event Outcomes with Additive Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:26:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10985-019-09475-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.