IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jtrsec/v12y2019i3d10.1007_s12198-019-00203-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil unmanned aircraft systems and security: The European approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mikko Huttunen

    (University of Lapland)

Abstract

Civil unmanned aircraft systems, commonly known as drones, have many useful applications but can also be used to intentionally cause harm. Additionally, drones themselves can be subject to unlawful interference. In this article, I analyze how European Union’s new rules on drones affect such security threats. I argue that the rules on protecting drones from unlawful interference are promising, although the required security features can also be abused by rogue operators. The intentional misuse of drones, however, is not much deterred by the rules that seek to protect persons and property from such misuse. Rules concerning the operator and the pilot assume compliance, the mandatory technical safeguards can be circumvented, and oversight is difficult because drones are mostly operated from outside airports in a distributed manner. One way to fill the security gap is to employ anti-drone technology that detects drones and prevents them from entering sensitive airspace without permission. Although many airports have already adopted such technology, the EU should consider making it mandatory for the busiest airports. Regardless of rules enacted by the Union, though, reliable and safe means of stopping unlawful drone operations should be employed at critical locations. This applies also to areas like prisons and power plants, the protection of which falls within the ambit of national security.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikko Huttunen, 2019. "Civil unmanned aircraft systems and security: The European approach," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 83-101, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:12:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12198-019-00203-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12198-019-00203-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12198-019-00203-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12198-019-00203-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexey V. Shvetsov & Svetlana V. Shvetsova, 2017. "Protection of high-speed trains against bomb-carrying unmanned aerial vehicles," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 115-126, December.
    2. Michal Klenka, 2019. "Major incidents that shaped aviation security," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 39-56, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henderson, Isaac Levi & Shelley, Andrew, 2023. "Examining unmanned aircraft user compliance with Civil Aviation Rules: The case of New Zealand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 176-185.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anders Pousette & Josefa Vega Matuszczyk & Kenneth Björk & Marianne Törner, 2021. "AERODROM security climate: development and validation of the aerodrome security climate questionnaire (ADSECQ)," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 19-39, June.
    2. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming, 2022. "STARTUPS: Founding airlines during COVID-19 - A hopeless endeavor or an ample opportunity for a better aviation system?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 10-19.
    3. Abigail Luxton & Marin Marinov, 2020. "Terrorist Threat Mitigation Strategies for the Railways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Michal Klenka, 2021. "Aviation cyber security: legal aspects of cyber threats," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 177-195, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jtrsec:v:12:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12198-019-00203-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.