IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v19y2016i6d10.1007_s10951-015-0446-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Normal-form preemption sequences for an open problem in scheduling theory

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Chen

    (University of Warwick)

  • Ed Coffman

    (Columbia University)

  • Dariusz Dereniowski

    (Gdańsk University of Technology)

  • Wiesław Kubiak

    (Memorial University)

Abstract

Structural properties of optimal preemptive schedules have been studied in a number of recent papers with a primary focus on two structural parameters: the minimum number of preemptions necessary, and a tight lower bound on shifts, i.e., the sizes of intervals bounded by the times created by preemptions, job starts, or completions. These two parameters have been investigated for a large class of preemptive scheduling problems, but so far only rough bounds for these parameters have been derived for specific problems. This paper sharpens the bounds on these structural parameters for a well-known open problem in the theory of preemptive scheduling: Instances consist of in-trees of n unit-execution-time jobs with release dates, and the objective is to minimize the total completion time on two processors. This is among the current, tantalizing “threshold” problems of scheduling theory: Our literature survey reveals that any significant generalization leads to an NP-hard problem, but that any significant, but slight simplification leads to tractable problem with a polynomial-time solution. For the above problem, we show that the number of preemptions necessary for optimality need not exceed $$2n-1$$ 2 n - 1 ; that the number must be of order $${\varOmega }(\log n)$$ Ω ( log n ) for some instances; and that the minimum shift need not be less than $$2^{-2n+1}.$$ 2 - 2 n + 1 . These bounds are obtained by combinatorial analysis of optimal preemptive schedules rather than by the analysis of polytope corners for linear-program formulations of the problem, an approach to be found in earlier papers. The bounds immediately follow from a fundamental structural property called normality, by which minimal shifts of a job are exponentially decreasing functions. In particular, the first interval between a preempted job’s start and its preemption must be a multiple of 1 / 2, the second such interval must be a multiple of 1 / 4, and in general, the i-th preemption must occur at a multiple of $$2^{-i}$$ 2 - i . We expect the new structural properties to play a prominent role in finally settling a vexing, still-open question of complexity.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Chen & Ed Coffman & Dariusz Dereniowski & Wiesław Kubiak, 2016. "Normal-form preemption sequences for an open problem in scheduling theory," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 701-728, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:19:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10951-015-0446-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-015-0446-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-015-0446-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-015-0446-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Brucker & Johann Hurink & Sigrid Knust, 2003. "A polynomial algorithm for P | p j =1, r j , outtree | ∑ C j," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 56(3), pages 407-412, January.
    2. Yumei Huo & Joseph Leung, 2005. "Minimizing total completion time for UET tasks with release time and outtree precedence constraints," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 62(2), pages 275-279, November.
    3. Lee A. Herrbach & Joseph Y.-T. Leung, 1990. "Preemptive Scheduling of Equal Length Jobs on Two Machines to Minimize Mean Flow Time," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 487-494, June.
    4. Philippe Baptiste & Vadim G. Timkovsky, 2004. "Shortest path to nonpreemptive schedules of unit-time jobs on two identical parallel machines with minimum total completion time," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 60(1), pages 145-153, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianyu Wang & Odile Bellenguez, 2021. "Three notes on scheduling unit-length jobs with precedence constraints to minimize the total completion time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 649-662, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Xiaojuan & Lee, Kangbok & Pinedo, Michael L., 2021. "Ideal schedules in parallel machine settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 422-434.
    2. Lushchakova, Irene N., 2006. "Two machine preemptive scheduling problem with release dates, equal processing times and precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 107-122, May.
    3. D. Prot & O. Bellenguez-Morineau, 2018. "A survey on how the structure of precedence constraints may change the complexity class of scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 3-16, February.
    4. Lushchakova, Irina N., 2012. "Preemptive scheduling of two uniform parallel machines to minimize total tardiness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 27-33.
    5. Yumei Huo & Joseph Leung, 2005. "Minimizing total completion time for UET tasks with release time and outtree precedence constraints," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 62(2), pages 275-279, November.
    6. Azizoglu, Meral, 2003. "Preemptive scheduling on identical parallel machines subject to deadlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 205-210, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:19:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10951-015-0446-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.